Mrvarun Sudan vs Ministry Of Law & Justice on 16 December, 2015
obviate any apprehension in their minds of unfair or arbitrary marking of the
answers written by them. We hope and trust that
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 480 (0.91 seconds)Aniket Kumar Gupta vs Union Public Service Commission on 19 May, 2026
overall marks and identity of recommended
candidates are already publicly disclosed, withholding merely the bifurcation of subject-
wise marks becomes arbitrary and contradictory. The Appellant ... marks;
(iv) Personality Test/interview marks; and
(v) final total marks.
CIC/UPSCM/A/2025/617026 Page 11 of 17
16. Once the overall marks
Mr.S K Pawar vs Ministry Of Railways on 26 November, 2013
obviate any apprehension in their minds of unfair or
arbitrary marking of the answers written by them. We hope and trust that
Col. H. C. Goswami (Rtd) vs Military Intelligence, Army Hq, ... on 31 July, 2008
Gandhi vs. Union of India & Anr.
AIR 1978 SC 597 that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the
Constitution. In our opinion, the non-communication ... India (supra) that
arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
20. Thus it is not only when there is a bench mark
Smt.Vandana Nitin Deshpande vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation ... on 26 July, 2012
from the vice of arbitrariness, mala fide or corruption. The question
before the Delhi High Court was whether the marks obtained by other candidates ... from the vice of arbitrariness, mala fide or corruption. Therefore, it
is completely in public interest that the said marks obtained by other
candidates
Shri Rajnish Kumar Rai vs Ministry Of Home Affairs (Mha) on 2 March, 2009
Gandhi vs. Union of India & Anr. AIR
1978 SC 597 that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution. In
our opinion, the non-communication ... India (supra) that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
20. Thus it is not only when there is a bench mark
Abhimanyu Sasi Pavoor vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 2 January, 2025
selection status, and the details of the recruitment process- including the final
marks obtained, the rank list, and the names of the selected candidates-have ... refusal to disclose information, particularly the marks obtained and the
rank list of selected candidates, is arbitrary and illegal. It undermines the
principles of transparency
Abhimanyu Sasi Pavoor vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 2 January, 2025
selection status, and the details of the recruitment process- including the final
marks obtained, the rank list, and the names of the selected candidates-have ... refusal to disclose information, particularly the marks obtained and the
rank list of selected candidates, is arbitrary and illegal. It undermines the
principles of transparency
Abhimanyu Sasi Pavoor vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 2 January, 2025
selection status, and the details of the recruitment process- including the final
marks obtained, the rank list, and the names of the selected candidates-have ... refusal to disclose information, particularly the marks obtained and the
rank list of selected candidates, is arbitrary and illegal. It undermines the
principles of transparency
Abhinav Singh vs Union Public Service Commission on 15 May, 2025
moderation of
marks applied by UPSC in evaluating answer sheets of the candidates pertaining to Civil
Services (Main) Examination is arbitrary ... illegal and that the method of scaling of marks
applied by UPSC was held to be arbitrary and illegal by Supreme Court in Sanjay Singh