failed to appreciate that the addition made by way of estimating
the mark up at 20% on the cost price, thus resulting ... mark up on
the selling price (tagged to the goods) and hence the reworking of the excess
value of stock is arbitrary, unjustified, and unsustainable
mark-up of 9.15% on
50% of the AMP expenses is devoid of any merit and unsustainable in law
as it is highly arbitrary ... identifying the comparable companies for the
limited purpose of quantifying the mark-up to be added to the 50% of AMP
expenses which was incorrectly
M/S. P.P. Enterprises,Dindigul vs Acit, Central Circle-3,, Coimbatore on 9 February
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs P P Enterprises, Bengaluru on 9 February, 2026
आयकर
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs P P Enterprises, Bengaluru on 9 February, 2026
आयकर
Palanisamy Raghupathy,Bengaluru vs Acit, Central Circle-3, Coimbatore on 9 February, 2026
आयकर अपील
Palanisamy Raghupathy,Bengaluru vs Acit, Central Circle-3,, Coimbatore on 9 February, 2026
आयकर अपील
M/S. P.P. Enterprises,Dindigul vs Acit, Central Circle-3,, Coimbatore on 9 February
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs P.P. Constructions, Karur on 9 February, 2026
आयकर
Palanisamy Raghupathy,Bengaluru vs Acit, Central Circle-3,, Coimbatore on 9 February, 2026
आयकर अपील
