reservation of 50 marks, 1/3 of the total marks, for interview cannot on any principle be characterised as excessive, arbitrary and irrational to infringe ... total marks of 160 consisted of 60 marks for the written test; 60 marks were for previous. qualification and accounts etc. 40 marks for viva
ahead by 50 marks than the other candidate, the Board by allotting 80 marks to the latter and 20 marks to the former could select ... patently arbitrary or the risk of arbitrariness is so high that a reasonable person would regard arbitrariness as inevitable, that the assessment of marks
object sought to be achieved.
The criteria and marks to be awarded are arbitrary as these
conditions are to be considered, after the auction ... specific query, as to how this criteria of awarding marks is
arbitrary, counsel for the petitioner was unable to refer to any
principle
Service (Judicial Branch). Allocation of 200 marks for
viva-voce against the written examination of 900 marks is arbitrary,
unjustified, violative of the recommendations made ... respondent No.2 has argued that allocation of 200 marks against 900 marks is
not arbitrary and unreasonable and violative of Article
grading of 33 ½ %marks for ex-servicemen and
22.2% marks for general category for viva voce
test as excessive and arbitrary. In Ashok Kumar
alias ... Diploma/ Experi- Academic Interview Total
No. passing passing Degree % ence Marks Marks Marks
secured 96.50 marks, whereas the petitioner got 95.50 marks.
Further award of 3 marks for business ability/acumen was also arbitrary for
the reason that ... awarding the marks. The
petitioner had experience in all three columns. The maximum marks, which
could be awarded for experience were 4 marks.
Besides this
while awarding marks in the interview arbitrarily awarded 8 marks to the
petitioner, whereas 19 marks has been awarded to the 4th respondent ... order to eliminate the petitioner, he has been awarded 8 marks and 19
marks to the 4th respondent respectively.
12. Learned State counsel was directed
marks,
accordingly petitioner has been awarded 4 marks and she is not entitled
for 16 marks for 4 awards. Petitioner has been awarded 6 marks ... marks, whereas the 2nd and 3rd respondents have been awarded 14 and 12
marks respectively for 15 marks which has led to arbitrariness in
awarding
service, 50% marks allocated for
viva voce and 50% marks for academic
performance could not be said to have suffered
from any arbitrariness warranting interference ... many marks should be allowed
for the interview test. Of course the
marks must be minimal so as to avoid
charge of arbitrariness
students of Class VI
onwards into Sections on the basis of marks is arbitrary,
discriminatory and violative of child rights?
(b) Whether order dated ... students of
Class VI onwards into Sections on the basis of marks is arbitrary,
discriminatory and violative of child rights?
13. By virtue of Article
