qualifying marks for passing the TET into the portion of the unreserved category candidate, has been repudiated thus to be illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory ... view of the arbitrary and unallowable large scale relaxation granted to the candidates of reserved category in the qualifying marks for TET in gross violation
Sudesh Kumar Verma And Anr vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Ors on 19 December, 2013
Rajendra Singh Meel And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Ors on 19 December, 2013
Bharat Kumar Mehta And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Ors on 19 December, 2013
Surendra Kumar Bagaria And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Ors on 19 December, 2013
Pradeep Kumar Sharma And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Anr on 19 December, 2013
Santosh Kumar Sain And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Ors on 19 December, 2013
been ordered; and sought the declaration that with reduction of the marks of the candidate empanelled at serial number 1, now they were required ... also contended that the proceedings for rejection of marks without any notice were totally arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice. Adding another
Nand Ram Meena And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Anr on 19 December, 2013
Babu Lal Bairwa And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Anr on 19 December, 2013
