Annexures R-2/A and R-2/B
respectively. The final marks sheet were then placed and
thereafter unanimously approved ... Committee/Full Court forming their
unanimous opinions Is neither so arbitrary or
capricious nor can be said to be so irrational as to
shock
there will be no question or hardly any question of any
rt
arbitrariness.
35. At this stage, we may also notice that this court ... Annexures R-2/A and R-2/B
respectively. The final marks sheet were then placed and
thereafter unanimously approved
there will be no question or hardly any question of any
rt
arbitrariness.
35. At this stage, we may also notice that this court ... Annexures R-2/A and R-2/B
respectively. The final marks sheet were then placed and
thereafter unanimously approved
there will be no question or hardly any question of any
rt
arbitrariness.
35. At this stage, we may also notice that this court ... Annexures R-2/A and R-2/B
respectively. The final marks sheet were then placed and
thereafter unanimously approved
there will be no question or hardly any question of any
rt
arbitrariness.
35. At this stage, we may also notice that this court ... Annexures R-2/A and R-2/B
respectively. The final marks sheet were then placed and
thereafter unanimously approved
there will be no question or hardly any question of any
rt
arbitrariness.
35. At this stage, we may also notice that this court ... Annexures R-2/A and R-2/B
respectively. The final marks sheet were then placed and
thereafter unanimously approved
there will be no question or hardly any question of any
rt
arbitrariness.
35. At this stage, we may also notice that this court ... Annexures R-2/A and R-2/B
respectively. The final marks sheet were then placed and
thereafter unanimously approved
exercise of this power. (See Whirlpool Corpn. v.
Registrar of Trade Marks (1998) 8 SCC 1.) And this
plenary right of the High Court ... connected matters.
of the State or its instrumentality is arbitrary and
unreasonable so as to violate the constitutional mandate
of Article 14 or for other
exercise of this power. (See Whirlpool Corpn. v.
Registrar of Trade Marks (1998) 8 SCC 1.) And this
plenary right of the High Court ... connected matters.
of the State or its instrumentality is arbitrary and
unreasonable so as to violate the constitutional mandate
of Article 14 or for other
exercise of this power. (See Whirlpool
Corpn. v. Registrar of Trade Marks . [(1998) 8 SCC 1]) And this
plenary right of the High Court ... available remedies unless such action of the State or its
instrumentality is arbitrary and unreasonable so as to violate the
constitutional mandate of Article
