Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

C.V. Pandurangaiah Shetty vs N.S. Lakshmipathaiah Shetty on 2 April, 2016 IN THE

APPEAL (a) The judgment and order under the appeal is illegal, arbitrary and the same is passed without considering and appreciating the facts and circumstances ... court has not considered the facts and circumstances along-with the exhibits marked on both the sides while passing the judgment. (e) The trial court

lower court, the complainant himself examined as P.W.1 and got marked Ex.P1 to 19. After conclusion of trial, statement of accused ... appeared in the prosecution evidence. Accused himself examined as DW1, and got marked one document as Ex.D.1. 6. On hearing the parties, learned

lower court, the complainant himself examined as P.W.1 and got marked Ex.P1 to 4. After conclusion of trial, statement of accused ... prosecution evidence. Accused has not let in defence evidence and not marked any documents. 6. On hearing the parties, learned Magistrate recorded a finding that

Thereafter, the complainant has examined himself as P.W.1 and got marked Ex.P.1 to P.11 and closed his side of evidence ... incriminating evidence against her and examined herself as DW1 and got marked documents Ex.D1 and 2. The trial court after hearing the arguments

points arise for my determination: 1) Whether the impugned order is illegal arbitrary and requires interference by this Court ? 8 Crl.A.No.546/2015 ... During the course of trial Praveenkumar examined as PW1 and got marked documents Ex.P1 to P19. On the other hand accused examined himself

points arise for my determination: 1) Whether the impugned order is illegal arbitrary and requires interference by this Court ? 2) What Order? 7. My findings ... During the course of trial complainant himself examined as Pw1 and got marked documents Ex.P1 to P7. On the other hand accused himself

points arise for my determination: 1) Whether the impugned order is illegal arbitrary and requires interference by this Court ? 2) What Order? 7. My findings ... during the course of trial complainant himself examined as PW1 and got marked documents Ex.P1 to P21. On the other hand accused himself

points arise for my determination: 1) Whether the impugned order is illegal arbitrary and requires interference by this Court ? 2) What Order? 7. My findings ... during the course of trial plaintiff side examined witness PW1 and got marked documents ExP1 to P26. Accused himself examined as DW1. Trial court after

points arise for my determination: 1) Whether the impugned order is illegal arbitrary and requires interference by this Court ? 8 Crl.A.No.549/2015 ... During the course of trial Praveenkumar examined as PW1 and got marked documents Ex.P1 to P18. On the other hand accused examined himself