would award 5 marks
towards 'outstanding' grading, 4 marks toward 'very good'
grading and 3 marks towards 'good' grading ... grading and award him 22 marks as
against 20 marks awarded to the respondent. Again, there
is nothing arbitrary or unreasonable in the method
marks) and Record Book (5 marks). However, he contends the
Examiners had, in a wholly arbitrary manner, awarded no marks for
the Record Book while ... marks for the practical examination into
three sub-heads of 10 marks for practical, 10 marks for viva-voce and
5 marks for the Record
first
provision regarding addition of 4 marks for graduates and 3 marks for
postgraduates, is clearly arbitrary and in so far as the candidates ... marks to the candidates whose close relatives are not in
Government employment would be given 5 marks, is again arbitrary as the
said provision
appellant was awarded 79 marks - including evaluation of past performance
(29/40 marks) and current performance (50/60 marks). The appellant
LPA 807/2017 Page ... awarded marks (out of the
maximum of 60 marks) had seen the performance of each candidate. It was
also contended the award of marks
marks 15 Marks
2 Qualification
(a)For Ph.d in concerned subject 9 Marks 9 Marks
(b)For M.Phil with SLET / NET 6 Marks ... SLET / NET 5 Marks
3 Interview 10 Marks
Total 34 Marks
(i).Marks for interview has been prescribed as 10 marks
and for other qualifications
additional weightage marks for
the services rendered on contract basis and the respondents
have not properly calculated service weightage marks. Since
marks were erroneously deducted ... examining the case of the
petitioners and not awarding weightage marks is arbitrary and
illegal.
8. The learned Standing Counsel for the official respondents
contended
candidates should have been given equal
marks for all the deleted questions or marks ought to
26
have been given only to those candidates ... less the deleted questions. Redistribution of
marks with regard to deleted questions cannot be said to
be arbitrary or irrational. The Commission has adopted
that they failed to meet the bench mark of 20 years and such
deduction is absolutely arbitrary and illegal. It is further submitted by learned
total of, marks awarded to each candidate on the basis of 10th and 12th Board examination results and marks obtained by him in Physical Efficiency ... selection process on the basis of 10th and 12th standard marks, is wholly irrational, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution
voce carries 150
marks; candidates in General Category must secure 50% marks and
candidates of Reserved Category must secure 45% marks to be eligible ... marks fixed for interview should be removed. Fixation
of cut off marks could not be said to be arbitrary or unreasonable. Viva
voce plays
