Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd vs Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd on 9 January, 2020 Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE

marks specified, Clause 25 would, however, provide the full discretion to the DSSSB to fix the minimum qualifying marks for selection. In the instant case ... grievance that the clause is arbitrary and might affect their right ultimately since no minimum marks that is to be obtained has been indicated therein

mistakes despite the fact though prima facie appeared as mistakes is illegal arbitrary irrational irregular and unwarranted and required to redraw the list and consequently ... respondents in not following the method of Normalization for evaluation of marks of the candidates appeared in the written test conducted for recruitment

such extension by issuing errata notification is nothing but arbitrary act of respondents. The specific contention raised by the learned Advocate General is that extension ... dealt with for public purpose and in public interest. The marked difference lies in this that while the owner of private property may have

marks by the Public Service Commission on different facets and awarding only 2½ marks for higher qualification can be said to be arbitrary? This question

marks obtained by Beant Singh in an examination conducted by MARKFED were denied for want of knowledge. However, it was further submitted that marks obtained ... argument of the counsel for the petitioner that there was arbitrariness in giving marks after normalization process and that the respondent-Corporation has not uploaded

postgraduate course in medicine. The relevant rule provided for addition of 10% marks if a candidate possessed a diploma in the relevant subject or subspecialty ... being reproduced below: "20. There is nothing unreasonable or arbitrary in adding 10 marks for holders of a diploma. But to earn these extra

hands. While Ratan Singh (supra) lays down a general principle that bonus marks cannot be claimed as a matter of right, the remaining judgments ... denial of bonus marks to the petitioners for the period they have worked as Lady Health Visitor is held illegal, arbitrary and contrary

year 2009, were not having the minimum bench-mark of 50% marks or the necessity of the candidate having to pass the Teacher Eligibility Test ... marks as the bench-mark for a candidate to be eligible for appointment against the post of TGT cannot be termed to be arbitrary because

entrance of the Hotel Burj Al Arab show the mark instead of the mark . 8. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs further submits that Burj ... suffix and thus, according to the plaintiff the mark 'BURJNOIDA' is a fanciful and arbitrary trademark in India. The defendant cannot claim infringement