respondent No.4 to 6 having lesser percentage
of marks than the petitioners be declared
arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and also be
pleased to direct ... which
provides that for giving appointment senior
batch persons be given bonus marks. The
circular was subject matter of challenge in
Mahesh Chand Sharma
RESPONDENT AS WELL AS TO
THE PETITIONER, MARKED AT ANNEXURE-P, AS THE SAME
IS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND IRRATIONAL AND VIOLATIVE
OF ARTICLES
marks. The applicant in Group D, E and F will be ranked in order of the
aggregate total marks in case of equal marks, they ... given two additional marks and Group E
and grant one additional mark for one year experience. After granting
said marks a joint merit list
WHICH IS PRODUCED HEREWITH FOR THE KIND
PERUSAL AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-J AS ILLEGAL,
ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY AND OPPOSE TO THE
PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE
conducted by the Professional Examination
Board, Bhopal, as illegal and arbitrary. Further, the respondents be
directed to qualify the petitioner in the selection and appointment ... award of additional marks. It is also
contended that the formula adopted by the Examination Board is
defective and arbitrary.
5. The learned counsel representing
conducted by the Professional Examination
Board, Bhopal, as illegal and arbitrary. Further, the respondents be
directed to qualify the petitioners in the selection and appointment ... award of additional marks.
It is also contended that the formula adopted by the Examination
Board is defective and arbitrary.
5. The learned counsel representing
mark in the category of Scheduled Tribes candidate is 377.23 marks. Petitioner's grievance is that though she secured marks above ... fact, if the marks are attempted to be converted into percentage, petitioner has scored 64% marks, which is above the marks disclosed
conducted by the Professional Examination
Board, Bhopal, as illegal and arbitrary. Further, the respondents be
directed to qualify the petitioners in the selection and appointment ... award of additional marks.
It is also contended that the formula adopted by the Examination
Board is defective and arbitrary.
5. The learned counsel representing
conducted by the Professional Examination
Board, Bhopal, as illegal and arbitrary. Further, the respondents be
directed to qualify the petitioner in the selection and appointment ... award of additional marks. It is also
contended that the formula adopted by the Examination Board is
defective and arbitrary.
5. The learned counsel representing
conducted by the Professional Examination
Board, Bhopal, as illegal and arbitrary. Further, the respondents be
directed to qualify the petitioner in the selection and appointment ... award of additional marks. It is also
contended that the formula adopted by the Examination Board is
defective and arbitrary.
5. The learned counsel representing
