Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Vintage Distillers Limited vs Ramesh Chand Parekh on 16 November, 2022 Author: Jyoti Singh Bench

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Atul Kumar Dwivedi on 7 January, 2022 Author: Uday

Arbitrary, fanciful and invented marks, ii. Suggestive marks, iii. Descriptive marks, iv. Generic marks. 8. The spectrum of distinctiveness of marks has been the subject ... distinctiveness of marks clearly explains how distinctiveness of marks is to be judged. The spectrum as explained in McCarthy on 'Trade Marks and Unfair Competition

Mark is used in a distinctive style and colour combination; (c) user dates back to the year 2002; (d) rival mark of the Appellants ... Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/004808 and an arbitrary mark, entitled to high degree of protection. Use of the registered mark by the Appellants

many marks should be allowed for the interview test. Of course the marks must be minimal so as to avoid charges of arbitrariness ... service officers the lowest marks obtained were 20 while the highest marks secured were 171 and the spread of marks in the viva voce test

descriptive, (3) suggestive, (4) arbitrary or fanciful. The lines of demarcation, however, are not always bright...” A generic mark is one which describes a product ... purpose, ingredient or characteristic of a product or service; and an arbitrary mark is chosen capriciously and does not bear any discernible connection with

house. Marks which are generic, descriptive or suggestive have lower degree of legal protection as compared to marks which are arbitrary or fanciful ... lead to deceptive similarity, particularly when the products were same. The mark was arbitrary in respect of the product rice and was entitled

bird" respectively and is thus a fanciful and arbitrary mark in relation to helmets and auto-accessories, hence, inherently distinctive and exclusively associated with

award of marks by Annexure R-1 dated 13-10-2021 by which 40% marks have been awarded to educational qualification, 15% marks for knowledge ... many marks should be allowed for the interview test. Of course the marks must be minimal so as to avoid charges of arbitrariness

award of marks by Annexure R-1 dated 13-10-2021 by which 40% marks have been awarded to educational qualification, 15% marks for knowledge ... many marks should be allowed for the interview test. Of course the marks must be minimal so as to avoid charges of arbitrariness