Limitation, reliance has been placed by Mr. Mehta on Art. 166 in the first Schedule to the Limitation Act . Under that Article, for all applications ... Supreme Court has in that case clearly held that the Art. 166 in Schedule I to the Indian Limitations Act applies only when the sale
discretion."
Relying on Sub-clause (2) of Article 166 of the Constitution it was pointed out by counsel for the petitioners that several Circulars ... name of the Governor by a properly authenticated instrument under Art 166, counsel referred us to Business Rules of the State of Maharashtra framed
quasi judicial functions would
be out of the purview of Art.166 much less that would
not be covered by the Rules of business under
name of the Governor and are required to be authenticated under Art. 166 of the Constitution. Therefore, the action taken by the Municipal Council
executing Court took the view that the time prescribed by Art. 166 of the Limitation Act, 1908, (old Act) could be extended under Section
Vivek Batra vs The Union Of India on 29 October, 2013
Author: S.C.Dharmadhikari
never be termed as an
executive order requiring authentication
under Art. 166 of the Constitution of
India.
[d] Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar Vs.
Krishnaji Dattatraya Bapat
Mohammad Ilyas Alvi vs State Of Maharashtra on 7 August, 1964
Equivalent citations: AIR1965BOM156, (1965
Ramrao Laxmikant Shirkhedkar And Anr. vs Accountant-General, Maharashtra on 10 July, 1962
Equivalent citations
name of the
Governor as required by cl.(1) of Art.166 and then it has to
be communicated. As already indicated, no formal order
