Governor, it was held as under:
“Allocation of business under Art. 166(2) of the Constitution is not made
with reference to particular laws which ... there should have been an allocation made by the Governor under Art. 166(3)
of the power to detain under the Defence of India Ordinance
Governor, it was held
as under:
“Allocation of business under Art. 166(2) of the Constitution is
not made with reference to particular laws which ... there should have been
an allocation made by the Governor under Art. 166(3) of the power
to detain under the Defence of India Ordinance
case may be, authenticated in the
manner provided in Art.77(2) and Art.166(2) and is
communicated to the affected persons. The notings ... authenticated in the manner provided in Art.77
(2) or Art.166(2). A noting or even a decision
recorded in the file can always
Department but no order under Executive power of the
State under Art 166(2) was ever issued to that effect.
14. By relying upon
Dept., which has no legal sanctity in terms of Art.166(2) of the Constitution of India and contrary to law laid down in judgment
Mrvivek Garg vs Gnctd on 29 February, 2016
CENTRAL INFORMATION OMMISSION
(Room No.315, B
Mrvivek Garg vs Gnctd on 29 February, 2016
CENTRAL INFORMATION OMMISSION
(Room No.315, B
Mrvivek Garg vs Gnctd on 29 February, 2016
CENTRAL INFORMATION OMMISSION
(Room No.315, B
MOHALLA, MYSORE-570007
(D.BANUMAIAH"S COLLEGE OF
16
COMMERCE AND ARTS, MYSORE)
(HE RETIRED ON 30.06.2006.
HIS PPO NO.IS 280019 ... YEARS
166, SAMARASA, KESARE II STAGE
17
R S NAIDUWAGARA
MYSORE-570007.
(D.BANUMAIAH"S COLLEGE
OF COMMERCE AND ARTS,
MYSORE (SHE RETIRED
Jaipur II
OIA 166-KKG-ST-JPR-II-2010 dt.
03/06/2010
4
ST/1283/2010
BHARAT ARTS & CRAFTS,
CCE, Jaipur
