India [1991] 187 ITR 703 and Escorts Ltd. v. Union of India [1991] 189 ITR 81. In Sanghi Motors ' case [1991] 187 ... assessee. The same was neither unreasonable nor arbitrary, and not ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution. In Escorts Ltd. 's case
where an administrative action is challenged as "arbitrary" under
Article 14 on the basis of Royappa [1974] 4 SCC 3 (as in cases ... then was) pointed out that
``reasonableness'' of the administrator under Article 14 in the context of
administrative law has to be judged from
where an administrative action is
challenged as "arbitrary" under Article 14
on the basis of Royappa (1974) 4 SCC 3 (as in
cases ... then was) pointed
out that "reasonableness" of the
administrator under Article 14 in the context
of administrative law has to be judged from
where an administrative action is
challenged as "arbitrary" under Article 14
on the basis of Royappa (1974) 4 SCC 3 (as
in cases ... then was) pointed out that
"reasonableness" of the administrator
under Article 14 in the context of
administrative law has to be judged from
where an administrative action is
challenged as "arbitrary" under Article 14 on the
basis of Royappa (1974) 4 SCC 3 (as in cases ... then was)
pointed out that "reasonableness" of the
administrator under Article 14 in the context of
administrative law has to be judged from
SCALE 187, 2008 (15) SCC 233, (2009) 120 FACLR 313, (2009) 1 SCT 534, (2009) 1 SCALE 187, (2009) 1 CURLR 68, (2009) 3 SERVLR ... that it was not maintainable as the
order was in terms of Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (in short
the `Constitution
where an administrative action is
challenged as "arbitrary" under Article 14 on
the basis of Royappa (1974) 4 SCC 3 (as in
cases ... then was) pointed out that "reasonableness"
of the administrator under Article 14 in the
context of administrative law has to be judged
from
October, 2008
Equivalent citations: AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 187, 2008 AIR SCW 7114, (2009) 2 MAD LJ 1085, 2008 (13) SCALE ... filed a writ petition before the Madhya Pradesh
High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution with basically two prayers. They are as
under
187 and by this Court in the case of Gopinath Baliarsingh v. State : 1989 (I) FAC 37, there are certain articles which
CURLR 849, (1999) 1 JT 278 (SC), (1999) 2 LABLJ 187 ... ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
This writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of
India, 1950 (in short the 'Constitution') presents some unusual
