Central Act. It is contended that, by reason of Article 254(2)
of the Constitution of India, where a law made by the Legislature ... Article 254(2) is not a matter of idle formality and in order to bring about the result
contemplated Clause (2) of Article 254
repugnancy with the Central Act 1 of 1894. The proviso to Article 254(2) of the Constitution reads :
"Provided that nothing in this clause ... amend or repeal the. State law made under the proviso to Article 254(2) of the Constitution. Article 254 corresponds to Section
also
distinguishable with regard to the contention of repugnancy and
Article 254(2) of the Constitution. In the said case, the Act in
relation ... Article 246; in the second, by reason of clause (1) of
Article 254. The Apex Court held further that, clause (2) of Article
254 deals
between the provisions, the Kerala Act will prevail in view of Article 254 (2). Article 254(2) reads as follows:
(2) Where a law made ... over the Central Legislation on the same field in view of Article 254(2) if there is repugnancy. It is a well settled preposition that
allied character, then Article 254 (2) will have no
application. The principle embodied in Section 107 (2) and
Article 254 (2) is that when there ... later
enactment, will be equally applicable to a question Under
Article 254(2) whether the further legislation by Parliament
is in respect of the same
M.P.Chothy vs State Of Kerala on 29 September, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2020
Muraleedharan T vs State Of Kerala on 16 June, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR 2021 (NOC
Industrial Disputes Act
by virtue of the operation of Article 254(2) of the
W.A. Nos.2516 ... Arbitration Court will be exclusive by
virtue of the operation of Article 254(2) of the
Constitution. We, therefore, refer these cases for
consideration
Legislature or High Court after 1.2.1977 will require Presidential assent under Article 254(2). Article 254 will apply in cases where there is an existing ... express repeal cannot be nullified without following the procedure prescribed in Article 254(2). It has been held in Pr. Rishikesh and Anr. v. Salmabegum
also
distinguishable with regard to the contention of repugnancy and
Article 254(2) of the Constitution. In the said case, the Act in
relation ... Article 246; in the second, by reason of clause (1) of
Article 254. The Apex Court held further that, clause (2) of Article
254 deals
