Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 117 (0.61 seconds)

Kuldeep Singh Yadav vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi Through ... on 6 May, 2010

endeavour to uphold the impugned order, contend that under provisions of Article 338 of the Constitution of India, the Commission would have jurisdiction to deal ... respondents, as mentioned above, would, however, contend that under Article 338 of the Constitution, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has power
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S.R. Samuel vs Union Of India on 21 March, 2011

under powers conferred by sub-clause (f) of Clause 5 of Article 338 A of the Constitution of India. He would contend that it would ... these rules that the NCST is not controlled by the Government. Article 338 A, inter alia, reads thus: "338 A. National Commission for Scheduled
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somnath vs Comm. Of Police on 8 August, 2025

sustain their livelihood. The issue of compassionate appointment derives its origin from Article 16 (2) 7 Item no.56 OA No.1668/2021 ... Haryana & others v. Rani Devi & another , 1996 SCALE (5) 338, wherein it was observed that it need not be pointed out that claim
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Madan Lal Jhamb vs Mcd & Ors. Through on 23 May, 2013

within the territory of India. The concept of equality enshrined in that article is a positive concept. The Court can command the State to give ... their favour by the State or its agencies/instrumentalities. In other words, Article 14 cannot be invoked for perpetuating irregularities or illegalities. In Chandigarh Admn
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 28 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next