Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Himmatbhai Bhimjibhai Menia vs State Of Gujarat Through on 30 July, 2013 Author: Chief Justice

given a wider meaning to the words 'work done' in Article 18 and treated a works contract as coming within its purview ... Authority MANU/SC/0271/1988 : (1988) 2 SCC 338, the Supreme Court, while considering applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 , held

Section 43 of the Act, the period of limitation contemplated under Article 137 of the schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable ... 338 for returning a finding that limitation in a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act is three years in terms of Article

338, no such objection appears to have been taken and it was assumed that the article applied to electric energy as much ... Firm Attar Singh Sant Singh v. Municipal Committee Amritsar, AIR 1938 Lah 338 at p. 339 already mentioned in the Allahabad decision. I shall only

simple loan, but a deposit made under special circumstances. 3. If Article 59 applies, the suit is barred, the transaction having taken place more than ... lent' within the meaning of Article 59 , and Ichha Dhanji v. Natha I.L.R. 13 Bom. 338 is relied on as supporting this

date of the death of the testator/testatrix is barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act . According to him, a departure is shown ... reported in (1988) 2 Supreme Court Cases 338. He, thus, concludes that though the provisions of Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies

Rekhi v. Delhi Development Authority , (1988) 2 SCC 338, the Supreme Court, while considering applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 , held ... Rekhi v. Delhi Development Authority (1988) 2 SCC 338, the Supreme Court, while considering applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 , held

given a wider meaning to the words 'work done' in Article 18 and treated a works contract as coming within its purview ... 1988 : (1988) 2 SCC 338, the Supreme Co. Pet. 461/2015 Page 5 of 9 Court, while considering applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation

movable property" and therefore "goods" within the meaning of Article 52 of the Limitation Act . Relevant portions as observed in above said ... 338 no such objection appears to have been taken and it was assumed that the article applied to electric energy as much

finding of the Court below that Article 96 applies the learned Counsel for the respondent argues that Article 52 is not applicable because (1) electric ... demand. 7. If Article 96 is not applicable, it is contended that the only Article applicable it Article 120 which provides for period