Union Carbide India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 28 April, 1980
Union Carbide India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 28 April, 1980
Equivalent citations
Search Results Page
Search Results
41 - 50 of 31524 (0.46 seconds)Dr. Partap Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 4 April, 1962
under an Act of an appropriate Legislature under this Article. Again Article 372(1) of the Constitution provides that all laws in force immediately before ... continued under Article 313 are concerned the same have been continued subject to the provisions or that Article and Article 372(1). Once other provision
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Bharat General And Textile Industries ... on 4 April, 1985
other articles of the Constitution, or that the other articles shall not be an impediment to the operation of Article 278. While Article 372 ... subject to Article 278 , Article 278 operates in its own sphere in spite of Article 372. The result is that Article 278 overrides Article 372
Kaiser-I-Hind Pvt. Ltd. And Ors vs National Textile Corporation ... on 25 September, 2002
372 read with Article 366(10). For this purpose, he referred to
Article 366(10) and relevant part of Article 372 of the Constitution.
Article ... Article alone. On
the contrary it is of general application, ie.e., it applies to all
temporary enactments which were enacted pre-Constitution : Article 372
Ram Kirpal Bhagat & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 13 November, 1969
legislation to the areas in question was no
longer operative. Article 372(l) of the Constitution enacts
that the law in force in the territory ... competent
legislature or other competent authority. Explanation I to
Article 372 is that law in force in the Article shall
include a law passed
State Of Haryana & Ors vs Amar Nath Bansal on 15 January, 1997
under the Indian Constitution on January 26, 1950. By virtue
of Article 372 of the Constitution the laws in force in
PEPSU immediately before ... date of commencement of the
Constitution and by virtue of Article 372 of the
Constitution the said Regulations continued in the Part B
State
M.R. Venkataraman vs Commissioner Of Police And Anr. on 27 March, 1950
M.R. Venkataraman vs Commissioner Of Police And Anr. on 27 March, 1950
Equivalent citations
Uti Bank Ltd vs The Dy. Commissioner Of Central Excise on 20 December, 2006
treated as "law in force" within the meaning of Article 372 (1) of Constitution. An illuminating discussion of the subject made by Chagla ... British India at the relevant time within the meaning of Article 372 (1) of the Constitution of India and therefore continues to be in force
M/S. S. K. G. Sugar Ltd vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 26 April, 1974
Article 254
of the Constitution, to the extent of that repugnancy or
inconsistency would be void. In the light of Article 372 of
the Constitution ... neither
rendered inoperative by Article 254(1) , nor repealed or
altered by the competent Legislature within the
contemplation of Article 372 of the Constitution
The State Of Madras vs C. G. Menon And Another on 19 May, 1954
been
adapted under the provisions of article 372 of the
Constitution but this Act has not kept &live any of the
provisions ... India after the commencement of
the Constitution. Reliance was placed on article 372 (1) of
the Constitution which is in these terms: -
Notwithstanding the repeal