license basis.
Subsequently, between 31.5.1972 to 30.5.1975 these three tenants
assigned the tenancy rights in favour of the plaintiffs herein. By notice
dated
license basis.
Subsequently, between 31.5.1972 to 30.5.1975 these three tenants
assigned the tenancy rights in favour of the plaintiffs herein. By notice
dated
terms and conditions of the tenancy agreement which prohibited him from transferring and/or creating any assignment. In the plaint, it is further averred that ... Appellate Court found that the transfer or assignment was contrary to the stipulation contained in the tenancy agreement between the tenant and the erstwhile owner
occupation of the lands as he was not entitled to get assignment of tenancy rights in his favour from Bai Marium, in view
tenant ceases to be in occupation upon termination of his tenancy, eviction, assignment or transfer in any other manner of his interest In the premises ... affidavit in reply has set up a specific case of tenancy. We deem it fit to quote some of the relevant portions from his affidavit
tenant ceases to be in occupation upon termination
of his tenancy, eviction, assignment or transfer in any other manner
of his interest in the premises
suit in part, declaring an agreement of assignment
(Exhibit 1) and an agreement for tenancy (Exhibit 2), both dated
August 13, 1992, as void documents ... apparent conflict
between executing an agreement of assignment simultaneously with
an agreement of tenancy. Whereas the agreement, coupled with the
rent receipt, in the absence
original tenants, Lalita Umakant
Dharadhar, assigned her tenancy rights in respect of Room No. 5 in
favour of the Petitioner. The Petitioner approached the Trust ... consideration, as a condition of the
relinquishment, transfer or assignment of his
tenancy of any premises;
(ii) the landlord or any person acting or
purporting
Civil Suit No. 21-A/1991;
b) that the tenancy cannot be assigned in favour of any
third person;
c) that the petitioner Santosh Kumar ... with a person whose contractual tenancy still subsists.
The incidents of such tenancy and a contractual tenancy must
therefore be the same unless any provision
deed of lease, the plaintiff was entitled to determine the
tenancy without assigning any reason therefor. The plaintiff contends that the
fact that the plaintiff
