petitioner is that the respondent after
09.06.1992 and creation of tenancy, has sublet, assigned or
otherwise parted with the possession of the tenanted premises
without ... thereby, as per the petitioner, the subtenancy has been created by
the respondent and subtenancy did not take place during the
lifetime
evict the
said premises. On 21.1.05 vide notice dated 16.9.04 the tenancy ... lease agreement and has assigned its tenancy rights in
favour of defendant No.2. It was further submitted that plaintiff
has suppressed the fact that
evict the
said premises. On 21.1.05 vide notice dated 16.9.04 the tenancy
of the defendant was terminated and the defendant was asked to
vacate ... transferred its assets arising
out of lease agreement and has assigned its tenancy rights in
favour of defendant No.2. It was further submitted that
Mehra and Smt. Janak Rani Mehra died, their joint rights of tenancy
devolved upon the surviving tenants/partners/persons i.e the respondents ... time of
inception of tenancy are no more partners in the said partnership firm and
they have sublet or assigned or parted with possession
Gupta has nothing to do with
the tenancy rights. It is further stated that tenancy rights remained
vested in M/s Delhi Iron Syndicate ... lease hold rights and tenancy rights stands transferred to the
respondent and it amounts to subletting, assigning or parting
with the possession
originally let it. It is alleged that respondent
no. 1 sublet, assigned and parted with the possession of his
entire tenanted premises in favour ... time, has sublet, assigned and parted with the
possession of his entire tenancy premises in favour of
respondent nos. 2 and 3 as alleged. Thus
originally let it. It is alleged that respondent
no. 1 sublet, assigned and parted with the possession of his
entire tenanted premises in favour ... time, has sublet, assigned and parted with the
possession of his entire tenancy premises in favour of
respondent nos. 2 and 3 as alleged. Thus
rent
agreement in his presence and he also signed this agreement of
tenancy as an attesting witness and other attesting witness was Sh.
Pratap Singh ... tenancy and the respondent was inducted as a
tenant in the suit premises. Now, the petitioner has alleged that the
respondent has sublet, assigned
further stated that the aforesaid tenants after 09.06.1952 sublet,
assigned or parted with the possession of a major portion of the
tenanted premises ... show the alleged tenancy rather the objectors are the sub lettees to
whom the premises has been sublet, assigned or parted with by the
tenants
residential purposes only @ 150/ p.m., but he
has sublet, assigned or otherwise parted with the possession of the
suit premises to respondent ... residential cum commercial purposes. It is also averred
that though the tenancy was taken in the name of respondent no. 1,
but it was with
