order was withdrawn and petitioner was
reverted to the post of Assistant Lineman. Petitioner retired on 31.01.2014
on attaining the age of superannuation.
After ... respondents realised that petitioner had been reverted
to the post of Assistant Lineman but actually till the date of his retirement,
petitioner was being paid
post of
Helper/Beldar was re-designated to that of Assistant Lineman keeping in
view the letter of the Department of Local Government dated ... fact the petitioner gave his joining as Assistant Lineman on
02.09.2002. Learned counsel for the petitioner supports the said arguments
on the basis
Petitioner is wife of deceased Balraj who was working
as Assistant Lineman with respondent No.1 Corporation. As the
husband of the petitioner died while ... April 27,
2009, after having rendered continuous regular service as
Assistant Lineman from August 23, 2007 to April 27, 2009.
Petitioner has further averred
such till 04.05.2016 when his services were
regularized as an Assistant Lineman. Unfortunately, while working as
Assistant Lineman, husband of the petitioner died ... Feeder and thereafter, his services were regularized as an
Assistant Lineman on 04.07.2000. Ultimately, he retired as Assistant
Lineman on 28.02.2013. After the retirement, petitioner
Municipal
Corporation, Amritsar on 31.07.1980 and thereafter, he was promoted as
Assistant Lineman on 10.01.1996 and further promoted as a Lineman on
02.09.2009. While working ... ground that when the petitioner was
promoted to the post of Assistant Lineman on 10.01.1996 and further
promoted as a Lineman
year 1997, when services of the
petitioner were regularized as an Assistant Lineman in March, 1997 by the
respondent-Department. The petitioner continued working
correct appreciation
of the controversy in hand.
While working as an Assistant Lineman, the respondent-
plaintiff absented himself from duty from 17.03.2004. The employee
respondent-Department. Thereafter, the petitioner was
promoted to the post of Assistant Lineman and then to the post of Lineman
by the respondent-Department, from
fact the appellant-plaintiff was working on the post of Assistant
Lineman with the respondents since 18.04.1973 and upto the year 2007,
when the appellant ... their able assistance.
6. It is a matter of fact that the appellant-plaintiff was appointed
on the post of Assistant Lineman in the year
working with the respondents and while working on
the post of Assistant Lineman, the petitioner attained the age of
superannuation on 31.01.2016 and retired. After ... parties and have gone
through the record with their able assistance.
Once it is a conceded fact that the order terminating the
services
