Vaibhav Global Limited, Jaipur vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 19 December, 2018
Vaibhav Global Limited, Jaipur vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 19 December, 2018
vk
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 570 (0.84 seconds)Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd., ... vs Acit, Jaipur on 30 May, 2017
Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd., ... vs Acit, Jaipur on 30 May, 2017
vk;dj
Shri Pradeep Kumar Agarwal, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, Jaipur on 6 November, 2018
assessee further submitted the return of
income and confirmation of V. Khandelwal & Co., Suman Traders,
Bhawani Impex but the same were not found acceptable ... such concerns exist on the given addresses,
however, confirmations were received by post automatically in the
month of November, 2016 which raises the doubt
Hari Narain Parwal, Jaipur vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 6 November, 2023
inherently has power not to levy penalty. Thus, the ld. CIT (A) confirmed the
penalty under a wrong notion. The provisions of section 271AAB itself ... held that the levy of
penalty is automatic and therefore, we confirmed the action of the ld. CIT(A). In
the light of this facts
Bitthal Das Parwal, Jaipur vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 6 November, 2023
inherently has power not to levy penalty. Thus, the ld. CIT (A) confirmed the
penalty under a wrong notion. The provisions of section 271AAB itself ... held that the levy of
penalty is automatic and therefore, we confirmed the action of the ld. CIT(A). In
the light of this facts
Modern Threads (India) Ltd. , Jaipur vs Department Of Income Tax on 11 August, 2015
contentions of the assessee company and made/ confirmed addition
to the returned income did not automatically invite penalty. Where
divergent views exit either within ... particulars of its income and
furnished inaccurate particulars. The CIT (A) confirmed the
penalty but on further appeal, the Tribunal deleted it. On the facts
Sunil Kumar Nayak,Jhunjhunu vs Dlc-C-(123)(1) , Jaipur on 19 August, 2025
imposed by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A)
automatically gets deleted.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced
Shri Mohamed Mohtram Farooqui, ... vs Acit, Circle, Jhunjhunu on 9 December, 2020
once reference is made to section 132 then the same is automatically
deemed to include reference to section 132A also. Further, though the assessee
offered ... automatically deemed to include reference to section 132A is
incorrect interpretation of the law. Therefore, the penalty imposed by AO and
confirmed
M/S Silver And Art Palace, Jaipur vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 11 February, 2019
above, we are of the opinion that the order of
the Tribunal confirming the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) does
not suffer from any illegality ... opportunity of being heard. It
further re-affirms that penalty is not automatic otherwise making the
provision for giving hearing or opportunity will not make
Dwarka Gems Limited , Jaipur vs Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax , ... on 11 September, 2024
circumstances of the case the ld.
CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the AO of levying
the penalty even though ... case and in
law the ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the AO
in levying penalty