Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

clearly laid down in the case of Bissessur Mullick v. Dhiraj Mahtab Chand (B

treated, the Full Bench case of Soudaminee Dossee v. Dheraj Mahtab Chahd (B. L. R., Sup. Vol., 585; S.C., 6 W. R., Mis Rule

B.L.R. 630 : 2 Suth ... Baboo Lekraj Roy v. Baboo Mahtab Chand 14 M.I.A. 393 : 17 W.R. 117 : 10 B.L.R. 35 : 2 Suth

Bykunt Nath Singh v. Mahtab Chand 17 W.R. 447 : 9 B.L.R. 87; Bejoy Chand v. Amrita

quarters at 10-B, Diamond Harbour Road. It is the prosecution allegation that on 14-2-1964 the accused Saday Chand Mahtab went ... statement made by the accused Madheswar Pathak one broken S. B. B L. gun with 25 cartridges and one bamboo lathi were recovered from

Court in -- 'Bisseseur Mullick v. Maharaja Dhiraj Mahtab Chund' 10 W.R. 8 (F. B.)(I), falls, within the first branch of this

Thus, in Bykunt Nath Singh v. Maharajah Dheraj Mahtab Chund 17 W.R. 447 : 9 B.L.R. 87, it was ruled that on reversal

Mahtab Chand v. Dhun Coomari 17 W.R. 254, Maniswar v. Beer Pertab 15 W.R. 18 : 6 B

tort. This argument of Mr. Basu is not tenable because the B. N. Railway is a department of the Government and it detained the goods ... Uday Chand Mahtab v. Province of Bengal, 51 Cal WN 537 (E), that the Union of India as representing the B. N. Railway is liable

Hanmant Kashinath v. Ganesh Annaji 5 Ind. Cas. 614 : 43 B. 612 : 21 Bom. L.R. 435]. See also Mayne's Hindu ... annuitants and granted to Dala. Banga Gopal. The case of Maharajah Dheraj Mahtab Chand v. Sreemuttee Dhun Coomaree 17 W.R. 254 is precisely