contended that Ex.B27 cannot be taken into consideration for holding against the appellants, because, as seen from Ex.B39, Telekapaili ... B. Catholics v. M.P. Athanasius, AIR 1954 SC 526, C. Audilakshmamma v A. Rama Rao, and K. Venkata Subbareddi v. B. Ramaiah
judgment of this Court in K.V. Subba Reddy v. B. Ramaiah, , rendered by a Single Judge. At the same time in these
that the specimen signature cards of P. Raghavaiah, B. Anjaneyulu, V. Kondalu, T. Rambabu, K. Ramaiah and K. Rama ... Venkateswarlu; (7) T. Ramulu; (8) K. Ramaiah; (9) K. Srinu; (10) P. Ramaiah; (11) B. Kondaiah; (12) B. Nagaiah
explained. Reliance also was placed on K.V. Subba Reddi v. B. Ramaiah per LRs., , wherein it was held that the plaintiff must succeed
also in K.V. Subba Reddi v. B. Ramaiah . Further, reliance was placed on the decision of this Court in Rajabathula Suryanarayana v. Yedukula ... that his father-in-law purchased the suit site under Ex.B-2-sale deed. The vendor of the plaintiff by name Sidda Raju
regime. He places reliance upon the judgments of this Court in B. Ramaiah v. Mandal Revenue Officer, Puttaparthi 1990 ( 1) ALT 290 and Harijana ... petitioners. Revenue records are also mutated, correspondingly.
11. In B. Ramaiah's case (supra), the land assigned to a beneficiary was mortgaged
what relief.
8. During trial on behalf of plaintiff Mutt one B.Ramaiah deposed
as PW.1 and placed reliance ... defendants, Dws.1 to 7
examined and they placed reliance upon Exs.B1 to B21 which are
certified copies of decree and judgments
Madhav Bapat, J.
1. The petitioner herein, Bandi Prakash, son of B. Ramaiah, convict No. 7893, lodged in Central Prison, Chenchalguda, Hyderabad, has filed
under Section 82 ; that
as a matter of fact one Mr. B. Ramaiah working as Superintendent in
the office of the Mutt, created facsimiles ... Mutt with reference to
activities of a person by name B. Ramaiah employed as the
Superintendent in the office of the Mutt, against whom
B-1 to B-15. The learned counsel also commented that merely because the mother of the plaintiff had attested Ex.B ... cannot be said that the gift executed by Makam Ramaiah Ex.B-2 is invalid or inoperative. Apart from the documentary evidence, the oral
