Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.73 seconds)

Kalahasthi Guruvaradhan, vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 18 June, 2025

considered would be that petitioners have additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/PGDCA/MCA respectively. Though both learned counsels for petitioners and also learned Assistant ... possessed the basic qualifications and also had additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/ PGDCA/MCA, meaning thereby they were all sufficiently familiar and equipped
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J. Lokesh, vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 18 June, 2025

considered would be that petitioners have additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/PGDCA/MCA respectively. Though both learned counsels for petitioners and also learned Assistant ... possessed the basic qualifications and also had additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/ PGDCA/MCA, meaning thereby they were all sufficiently familiar and equipped
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Duvvi Vinay Satya Kumar vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 18 June, 2025

considered would be that petitioners have additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/PGDCA/MCA respectively. Though both learned counsels for petitioners and also learned Assistant ... possessed the basic qualifications and also had additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/ PGDCA/MCA, meaning thereby they were all sufficiently familiar and equipped
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Boddu Soma Sekhar vs The State Of Ap on 18 June, 2025

considered would be that petitioners have additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/PGDCA/MCA respectively. Though both learned counsels for petitioners and also learned Assistant ... possessed the basic qualifications and also had additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/ PGDCA/MCA, meaning thereby they were all sufficiently familiar and equipped
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kasibhatla Venkata Phanidhara Sharma vs The State Of Ap on 18 June, 2025

considered would be that petitioners have additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/PGDCA/MCA respectively. Though both learned counsels for petitioners and also learned Assistant ... possessed the basic qualifications and also had additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/ PGDCA/MCA, meaning thereby they were all sufficiently familiar and equipped
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jayanthi Venkata Satya Chandrashekhar vs The State Of Ap on 18 June, 2025

considered would be that petitioners have additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/PGDCA/MCA respectively. Though both learned counsels for petitioners and also learned Assistant ... possessed the basic qualifications and also had additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/ PGDCA/MCA, meaning thereby they were all sufficiently familiar and equipped
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gusidi Lalitha Kumari vs The State Of Ap on 18 June, 2025

considered would be that petitioners have additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/PGDCA/MCA respectively. Though both learned counsels for petitioners and also learned Assistant ... possessed the basic qualifications and also had additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/ PGDCA/MCA, meaning thereby they were all sufficiently familiar and equipped
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J. Lokesh, vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 17 June, 2025

contend that all the petitioners have the additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/ PGDCA/MCA, the same itself would suffice to test their skills ... considered would be that petitioners have additional qualification of B.Com.(Computers)/PGDCA/MCA respectively. Though both learned counsels for petitioners and also learned Assistant
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next