paid by the Petitioner to the Respondent, Bharat
Heavy Electricals Limited („BHEL‟), were determined.
2. At the outset, it required to be noticed that ... UPRVUNL‟)
is the owner of the Obra Thermal Power Station. UPRVUNL approached
BHEL to undertake modernization, refurbishment and upgrading of the
units. BHEL in turn
MISL‟), New Delhi. On 29th September
1994, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. („BHEL‟) obtained an order from
MISL for supply of five diesel electric locomotives ... case, is that on 6th December 1994
MISL issued a letter to BHEL under the signature of its Vice
President whereby it stated that
background to the present petition is that late Mr. Prem Nath Bhel
together with his sons Mr. Surender Nath, (Respondent No. 2) late Mr.
Narender ... Nath represented by his wife Mrs. Vijay Bhel, (Respondent No.
3), late Mr. Devinder Nath represented by his wife Mrs. Surendri Bhel
electrical items." By letter
dated 7th April 1992 NTPC asked BHEL to expedite the mobilization of the
erection activities. In a letter dated 22nd ... stated that if there were delays in executing the contract by
BHEL/SAG, they themselves were responsible for the delayed
commissioning of the project
Date of decision: March 29, 2017
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED (BHEL) .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate
with Ms. Mahika Varma, Mr. Surjendu Sankar ... 2009
1. This petition by Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited („BHEL‟) under
Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 („Act‟) is directed
against
These are the objections filed by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. ('BHEL')
under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration ... 16th July 2004 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes
between BHEL and M/s. Pee Tee Engineering Associates ('PTEA
Shri Vijay Sharda, the then Deputy General Manager, I.M.C., BHEL, Jhansi and Shri N.K. Garg, the then Senior Manager, Transport Business Department ... BHEL, New Delhi in conspiracy with Shri J.K. Singh, Chairman of M/s. Mideast Integrated Steel Limited (MISL) abused their official position with
hereinafter referred to as the 'BHEL case'].
Execution Petition No. 188 of 2005 Page 2 of 17
6. Learned counsel for both ... modified to bring it in
conformity with the law explained in the BHEL case. Consequently, the
review petition is allowed and the order dated 22nd
retired Directors of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.
(„hereinafter referred to as the BHEL-Respondent No. 2). It is to be noted
that Appellants have different ... Below Board Level, the Ministry
of Heavy Industries, the Administrative Ministry of BHEL issued an office
memorandum dated 25th June 1999, providing for revision
Petitioner, who was working with Respondent No. 1 Bharat Heavy Electricals
Limited („BHEL‟) as an Assistant Cashier („AC‟), has filed this writ petition ... Page 1 of 7
2. The Petitioner was working with Respondent BHEL as an AC. A report of internal
audit of the BHEL submitted
