implementation of
Pragati-III, which include communications, exchanged with M/s
BHEL (EPC Contractor for Pragati-III).
g) The Central Commission vide Impugned Order dated ... delay was due to the coordination issue between
the Appellant and the BHEL. The Central Commission has also
Page
Vijay Agarwal, Advocate
Mr. Avtar Krishan Ganjoo, Technical Advisor
Reprographics India
For BHEL Mr. Mukesh Arora, GM, CDT, BHEL
Mr. Avnit, Sr. Executive (Delhi), BHEL ... Satish Asnani, DGM (Bhopal), BHEL
Mr. Chitresh Datta, Dy. Manager (Bhopal), BHEL
Case No. 41 of 2018 1
Order under Section
4119/2014 Page 1 of 48
management of the BHEL House and their workmen in respect of the
matter specified in the Schedule annexed with ... read to
the effect:-
"Whereas the action of the management of BHEL is not
regularizing the employment of Shri Udaibir Singh and 163
others
Estate Management, Bharat Heavy
Electricals Limited (hereinafter referred to as the "BHEL"). The case
of the appellant/writ petitioner, in brief ... claims that he was the
tenant of Shri Vijay Singh, the vendor. BHEL/respondent nos. 1 and
2 filed
commissioning the Project from duly approved
LOA issued to Contractor i.e. BHEL on 27.07.2007 by the management of
Appellant, DVC and rejected Appellant ... after due approval from Management of Appellant, DVC was issued
to BHEL, an EPC Contractor on 27.07.2007 (Zero Date as considered by the
Central Commission
deducted on the services of testing
and commissioning received from the BHEL and that appellant has
wrongly deducted tax at source at the rate ... found that assessee has contracted some of the
work to BHEL. One of the contract involved was the service of
transportation, insurance, erection, installation, testing
part of the petitioner in the selection of M/s BHEL as the principal
contractor or in the execution of contractual agreements or any delay ... conclusion that NTPC
was not imprudent in selecting M/s BHEL to execute the project and
the delay cannot be entirely attributable to NTPC, erred
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Trichy vs M/S. Bhel on 9 January, 2018
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH ... Excise (Appeals), Trichy)
Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy Appellant
Vs.
M/s. BHEL Respondent
E/428/2010 and E/544/2010
(Arising out of Order
registered
under the Companies Act, 1956
having its registered office at:
BHEL House, Asian Games Village,
Siri Fort, New Delhi .......... Plaintiff
Versus
1. PT. Merak ... Arguments Heard on : 15.02.2018
Judgment Pronounced on : 28.03.2018
Suit No. 9391/2016
BHEL Vs. PT Merak Page 1 /63
Appearance :Sh. Lalit Bhasin, Sh. Mudit
Ajay Kamble and his younger brother Vijay
Kamble were working for Lakhan Bhel House on commission basis at
Lucky Square, near Hutatma Garden, Solapur. Lakhan ... Bhel House
was owned by one Narsing Sathe. Deceased Ajay and Vijay used to
move around in Hutatma Garden looking for customers. After taking
their
