Criminal Revision No. 31/14 D.O.D ... vs Bma Wealth Creators Ltd & Others on 11 April, 2014
Criminal Revision ... Dalip Kumar vs BMA Wealth Creators Ltd & Others
IN THE COURT OF SH RAJESH KUMAR GOEL:
ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE -5 (NORTH),
ROHINI , DELHI
Kamdhenu Ispat Ltd vs M/S. Bma Readymix Concreate Pvt. Ltd on 21 September, 2011
IN THE COURT OF SHRI. ASHISH AGGARWAL, CIVIL JUDGE ... Through constituted attorney
Sh. Suraj Kumar Singh) ... Plaintiff
Versus
1. M/s. BMA Readymix Concreate Pvt. Ltd.
Through its CMD/ Managing Director
RU 8, First
Amit Gupta vs M/S Bma Wealth Creators Ltd on 26 September, 2018
IN THE COURT OF Ms. MANJUSHA WADHWA
ADJ04, (WEST), TIS HAZARI ... Paschim Vihar,
New Delhi110063 ... Plaintiff
versus
M/s BMA Wealth Creators Ltd
14/T, Paul Mansion, 1st floor,
6Bishop Lefroy Road,
Kolkatta
WEST DISTRICT, ROHINI COURTS, DELHI.
Civil Suit No. 59671/16
M/s BMA Readymix Concrete Pvt Ltd.
RU8, Ist floor, Pitampura, Delhi110034
Also ... readymix concrete in the name and
CS No: 59571/16 M/s BMA Readymix Concrete Pvt Ltd vs K.C Garg Page
Rakesh Kumar Yadav vs M/S Bma Wealth Creators Limited on 17 July, 2014
IN THE COURT OF MS. VINEETA GOYAL, ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT JUDGE ... Kunj Road, Mahipalpur,
New Delhi - 110037
........ Petitioner/Claimant
Versus
1. M/S BMA Wealth Creators Limited,
29/5A, Dr. Ambedkar Sarani, Topsia Road,
Vishwakarma
Rakesh Kumar Yadav vs M/S. Bma Wealth Creators Limited on 16 March, 2021
IN THE COURT OF SH. R.L. MEENA ... Vasant Kunj Road,
Mahipalpur, New Delhi110037
..........Petitioner
Versus
1. M/s. BMA Wealth Creators Limited
29/5A, Dr. Ambedkar Sarani,
Topsia Road, Vishwakarma
evidence of DW1 dated 21.06.2024
that trading account statement of BMA company never showed
any transaction by accused with the complainant. It is further
SHIV ... case of the defence side that the accused was
franchise holder of BMA Stock Broking and Commodities Pvt.
Ltd. The amount given to the accused
complainant. He further stated that he was working with a
company called BMA Creations and for the purpose of salary,
he had opened the account ... given the cheques in question to his
previous employer namely 'BMA Wealth Creditors' for the
purposes of his salary and it is further
also stated that plaintiff had not provided 100 sq feet space
in BMA area as required by the terms and condition of the contract ... that plaintiff has not provided the 100 sq. ft
space in BMA area as per terms and condition of Ex.PW1/3. Question
arises
bma n \7XoZ n p qAbr^`s eht:e X ^?Z
uvi#Y Zw^6_ e j ^xf6^ izyha t
icY7ZSl ... bma n]\7X Z{i#Y Z|X7Y Z []\7Z ^`_{a br^1d]^`_ e]f X7bmZ
