default.
39. The respondent also relied upon the case of Maharajah of Bobbili v. Narasaraju
Maharaja of Bobbili v. Venkatamarjulu Naidu 25 Ind. Cas. 585 : 39 M. 265 : 27 M.L.T. 409 : 16 M.L.T. 181; Padala Chekkaya
been said by the Judicial Committee in the case of Maharajah of Bobbili v. Narasaraju Veda Baliara
decisions of the Judicial Committee in the cases of Maharaja of Bobbili v. Narasaraja [1916] 39 Mad. 640, affirming on appeal the decision ... Madras High Court in Maharaja of Bobbili v. Narasaraja [1912] 37 Mad. 231. Jnanendra v. Kumar Jogendra Narain A.I.R. 1923 Patna 384, Rangaswami
Judicial Committee in the Privy Council case reported in -- 'Raja of Bobbili v. Inuganti China Sitaramasami Garu
been confirmed by the decision of the Judicial Committee in Maharajah of Bobbili v. Narasaraju Peda Baliara
decree. In support of this view the case of Maharaja of Bobbili v. Narasaraju Peda Simhutu
Federal Court in , and in other cases referred to in Rajah of Bobbili v. State of Madras , , and it was held by the Federal Court
relies on the decision of the Privy Council in Maharaja of Bobbili v. Raja Narasaraju
relies on the decision of the Privy Council in Maharaja of Bobbili v. Raja Narasaraju AIR 1916 P C 16 and on a judgment