Raja Of Bobbili vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras. on 4 December, 1936
Equivalent citations: [1937]5ITR78(MAD)
JUDGMENT
The question before ... representative of a Hindu undivided family."
The assessee, the Raja of Bobbili is the present holder of the impartible estate of Bobbili. During
terms of the Sanad. In Secretary of State v. Maharaja of Bobbili AIR 1919 PC 52 they preferred to have their decision on an implication ... High Court: see Secretary of State v. Maharaja of Bobbili AIR 1916 Mad 946 on the question of the ownership
sanad. In Secretary of State for India v. Maharaja of Bobbili ... Secretary of State for India v. Maharaja of Bobbili (1915) 30 M.L.J. 163 and of the Full Bench in Chinnappan Chetti v. Secretary
Secretary of Stain for India v. Maharaja of Bobbili (1915) 30 M.L.J. 163, Subbarayadu v. Secretary of State for India
Maharaja of Bobbili v. Zamindar of Chundi (1910) 21 M.L.J. 593 : I.L.R. 35 Mad. 108 and Mr. Sitarama Rao, as already
authority of certain observations relating to a stranger-purchaser in Maharaja of Bobbili v. Venkataramanjulu Naidu
means.
4. The learned Counsel for the applicant relies on Maharajah of Bobbili v. Narasaraju Peda Beliara Simhulu 1916 39 Mad 640. But this case
means.
3. The learned Counsel for the applicant relies on Maharajah of Bobbili v. Narasaraju Peda Beliara Simhulu
State 1919 41 Mad 840, Secy. of State v. Maharajah of Bobbili 1916 30 MLJ 163, Sannidhiraju Subbarayudu v. Secy. of State
representative of a Hindu undivided family.
2. The assessee, the Rajah of Bobbili, is the present holder of the impartible estate of Bobbili. During
