executed between the dealer and
BPCL on 28.10.2003, whereby BPCL had reserved the right to
terminate the said dealership, without assigning any reason whatsoever ... them to BPCL at a concessional rate, pursuant to
a promise made by BPCL to grant regular dealership of the retail outlet,
to be commissioned
active member, included
several scandalous imputations about the BPCL officers. Clearly, the
BPCL could not be expected to carry on any business relationship with ... action taken by the
BPCL was just and fair. BPCL could not be compelled to continue the
dealership which, in any event, had come
partnership
bank account for smooth functioning of business. Since, the BPCL
dealership norms and approvals were under negotiation for migration into
partnership firm, therefore whole ... demise on 21-04-2014, the process for
transfer of BPCL dealership and other related matters were under progress
and as a result, the purchase
order dated 18.01.2006 passed by the Territory Manager
(Retail), Meerut, BPCL terminating the dealership licence of the outlet of
respondent No.1-Firm and directed ... petition and quashed the termination order and directed the
BPCL to restore the dealership.
g) Aggrieved by the said order, the BPCL filed a Review
short "BPCL") was not a party to the suit. No relief had been claimed in the suit against BPCL. Dealership agreement with BPCL
business of Modelling, Cricket Commentary, Journalism and Consulting &
BPCL Dealership. The assessee filed his return of income with Revenue for
impugned
rents with the
Registrar.
In or about the year 2000 BPCL terminated the dealership of Howrah
Motors whereupon the decision was challenged in the writ ... resistance put up
by Howrah Motors following the determination of the dealership agreement, BPCL
could not be in physical possession of the property but BPCL
from the then Burmah Shell, now
Bharath Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL). In fact,
the dealership agreement was previously with father of the
petitioner ... long years. After its re-commission in the year 1993, BPCL
formulated another Dealership Agreement on 07/10/1993
against the policy guidelines
products
supplied by BPCL to customers, collect the price thereof
and remit it to the BPCL, for doing which, the BPCL would
give a commission ... only the consent of BPCL which
obviously the petitioner has since it is BPCL who has given
adhoc dealership to the petitioner. The provisions
facts will make the petitioner ineligible for the said RO
dealership. Further, the BPCL would be within its right to
withdraw the letter of intent ... when the same plots of
land have been offered for RO dealership, the BPCL was
justified in cancelling the candidature as per terms
