Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Shri Prashant Balwantrao Tekade vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2012 Author: B

Shri Prashant Balwantrao Tekade vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2012 Author: B

Shri Prashant Balwantrao Tekade vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 March, 2012 Author: B

High Court Appellate Side Rules cannot abridge the writ jurisdiction and basically designed to meet administrative requirements and administrative convenience. This provision is in respect

continued in the Appellate Side Rules. It is urged that when basic design of framers is to permit only limited challenge before learned single Judge

Section 3(13) also. Even word "basic wages" has not been used there. Basic pay always is understood as that part of total ... 2013 16:20:00 ::: 14 "basic" stands defeated. Word basic has been employed to indicate original remuneration shown of all these additions which

Niraj Vikas Pabale vs The Tahsildar on 21 September, 2011 Author: B.P. Dharmadhikari Bench

pointed out that in chart giving basic scales of pay for the first time, some designation are shown but then those are in relation

Section 3(13) also. Even word "basic wages" has not been used there. Basic pay always is understood as that part of total ... 2013 16:19:59 ::: 14 "basic" stands defeated. Word basic has been employed to indicate original remuneration shown of all these additions which

receive H.R.A. calculated at 25% of their basic salary. Their basic salary has increased from 1.7.1996 and therefore in view of this provision ... Mine Planning and Design Institute approached the Calcutta High Court claiming that they were entitled to HRA at 10% of basic pay fixed in terms