inviting the bids clearly states that the HUDCO place an
integrated urban design complex is developed by defendant no. 1 under directions
Suit No.:1026 ... space
for the alloted properties shall be done according to the basic design approved by
Delhi Urban Art Commission (DUAC), it is further stated that
cater to the somewhat irregular foot shape
for comfort and the basic design remains unchanged. A design
for an article that simulates a well known ... present case, the defendant no.1 has almost copied the
basic design of slipper including the features, colour, pattern
etc. It cannot be said
alleged that he was working as a
Graphic Designer. The work of a Graphic Designer is basically a sitting
job which involves working ... petitioner is no longer competent or qualified to
work as a Graphic Designer, as the job mainly involves mind application
and usage of hands, which
Cbi vs . Y. P. Sharma Etc. Judgement Dt. ... on 29 January, 2016
CBI Vs. Y
Union Of India vs M/S B.N.N Communication Engineers on 11 April, 2023
definition of ―design in
the Designs Act . Therefore, the original artistic
work, which may have inspired the creation of a
design, is not merely ... original
artistic work is something different from the
design. Secondly, the definition of ―design
expressly excludes, inter alia, any artistic work
defined in section
liability to pay the
same are required to be decided.
COMPENSATION
16. Basically only three facts need to be established by the claimants
for assessing ... Anshula Technological Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
(ATEC) as Process Design Manager with basic salary of Rs.
1,44,000/-. Petitioners have proved the employment offer
liable to make contribution to EPF, wherever
applicable @ 10% of basic salary. The basic salary of plaintiff ... liable to make
contribution to EPF wherever applicable @ 10% of basic salary.
The basic salary of plaintiff
adopting the distinctive mark, name, design, get
up or appearance of another goods. The basic question in this tort
is that whether the defendant
adopting the distinctive mark, name, design, get
up or appearance of another goods. The basic question in this tort
is that whether the defendant