dated 23.03.2011 invalidating the claim of the
petitioner of belonging to Pardesi Bhamta Vimukta Jati.
2. The petitioner was appointed as a Junior Engineer ... Vimukta Jati. The
petitioner had claimed to belong to Pardesi Bhamta Vimukta Jati and the
caste claim of the petitioner was referred to the scrutiny
claim of the petitioner of belonging to "Rajput Bhamta" (Vimukta Jati-
A).
The petitioner claims to be belonged to 'Rajput Bhamta ... Scrutiny Committee also found that in a
few documents the word "Bhamta" was written in a different ink,
whereas the ink used
Vimukta Jatis on 26.03.1999. The petitioner claimed
to belong to Rajput Bhamta Vimukta Jati and the caste claim of the
petitioner was referred ... same with a view to secure the benefits meant
for the Rajput Bhamta Vimukta Jati. It is stated that since
both the conditions that
Vimukta Jatis. The petitioner had claimed to belong to
'Rajput Bhamta' Vimukta Jati and the caste claim of the petitioner was
referred ... with a view to secure the benefits meant for the 'Rajput Bhamta'
Vimukta Jati. It is stated that the caste claim
dated 11.07.2017 rejecting the claim of the petitioner
of belonging to Rajput Bhamta VJ-A.
::: Uploaded on - 25/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 26/01/2018 ... considered whether the petitioner has proved his affinity to Rajput
Bhamta VJ. It is submitted that since the scrutiny committee was
not satisfied with
that the
petitioner had fraudulently secured the benefits meant for the Rajput Bhamta
(Vimukta Jati-A). It is stated that the caste claim ... that the petitioner had
fraudulently secured the benefits meant for the Rajput Bhamta (Vimukta
Jati-A).
Since both the conditions that are required
that the petitioner has fraudulently secured the
benefits meant for the Rajput Bhamta Vimukta Jati.
Shri Balpande, the learned Assistant Government Pleader
appearing ... that the petitioner has fraudulently secured the
benefits meant for the Rajput Bhamta Vimjukta Jati. The learned Counsel
state that an appropriate order
dated 21.10.2014 invalidating the claim of the
petitioner of belonging to Rajput Bhamta (Vimukta Jati).
2. The petitioner claims to belong to Rajput Bhamta (Vimukta
caste
claim of the petitioner of belonging to the "Rajput Bhamta Community"
was referred to the Scrutiny Committee for verification. It is stated
invalidating the
claim of the petitioner of belonging to Rajput Bhamta - vimukta jati.
Shri Gordey, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner
submitted that, initially
