orders of the scrutiny
committee invalidating their claim of belonging to Rajput Bhamta
Vimukta Jati, they are heard together and are decided by this common ... Jagansing Thakur. The petitioners claim to
belong to Rajput Bhamta Vimukta Jati. On the basis of the caste claim,
the petitioner in Writ Petition
orders of the scrutiny
committee invalidating their claim of belonging to Rajput Bhamta
Vimukta Jati, they are heard together and are decided by this common ... Jagansing Thakur. The petitioners claim to
belong to Rajput Bhamta Vimukta Jati. On the basis of the caste claim,
the petitioner in Writ Petition
dated 23.03.2011 invalidating the claim of the
petitioner of belonging to Pardesi Bhamta Vimukta Jati.
2. The petitioner was appointed as a Junior Engineer ... Vimukta Jati. The
petitioner had claimed to belong to Pardesi Bhamta Vimukta Jati and the
caste claim of the petitioner was referred to the scrutiny
2016 00:27:06 :::
wp.5391.16
2
to 'Rajput Bhamta' (Vimukta Jati). The petitioner has further sought the
protection of his services ... with effect
from 1.9.1992. The petitioner claimed to belong to 'Rajput Bhamta' which is
recognised as a Vimukta Jati (A), by the State
Zilla Parishad.
The petitioner claimed to belong to 'Rajput Bhamta' caste which is recognized
as 'Vimukta Jati' (A) by the State ... observation that the petitioner had fraudulently secured the benefits meant for
Rajput Bhamta. Shri Kalwaghe, learned counsel, further submitted that the
petitioner has fulfilled both
claim of the petitioner of belonging to "Rajput Bhamta" (Vimukta Jati-
A).
The petitioner claims to be belonged to 'Rajput Bhamta ... Scrutiny Committee also found that in a
few documents the word "Bhamta" was written in a different ink,
whereas the ink used
Vimukta Jatis on 26.03.1999. The petitioner claimed
to belong to Rajput Bhamta Vimukta Jati and the caste claim of the
petitioner was referred ... same with a view to secure the benefits meant
for the Rajput Bhamta Vimukta Jati. It is stated that since
both the conditions that
Vimukta Jatis. The petitioner had claimed to belong to
'Rajput Bhamta' Vimukta Jati and the caste claim of the petitioner was
referred ... with a view to secure the benefits meant for the 'Rajput Bhamta'
Vimukta Jati. It is stated that the caste claim
dated 11.07.2017 rejecting the claim of the petitioner
of belonging to Rajput Bhamta VJ-A.
::: Uploaded on - 25/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 26/01/2018 ... considered whether the petitioner has proved his affinity to Rajput
Bhamta VJ. It is submitted that since the scrutiny committee was
not satisfied with
that the
petitioner had fraudulently secured the benefits meant for the Rajput Bhamta
(Vimukta Jati-A). It is stated that the caste claim ... that the petitioner had
fraudulently secured the benefits meant for the Rajput Bhamta (Vimukta
Jati-A).
Since both the conditions that are required
