mentioned that on examination of the victim, no nail
markings or bite markings seen in breast or any part of the victim. The
victim ... deposed
that on examination of the victim, no injury or bite marking or nail marking
were seen in breast or thigh or in the body
submits that
prosecution has failed to prove on record that the bite marks,
if any, on the leg of complainant were caused ... chilli was
applied by daughter of accused on the bite mark at one place
only. In the MLC Ex. PW6/B, the doctor
left thigh just above the Knee joint. There was no bite
mark, scratch on her person. Private part examination lavia
majora and minora found
accused got provoked and strangulated her with his hands and then, bite her on her neck. The deceased died.
[c] By about 04.00 hours ... they found the dead body of the deceased. There was also bite mark on the neck. When P.W.1 shouted
injuries on the body of the deceased:-
1) An incomplete oblique ligature mark 24 cm total
Length 1 CM width present over the upper part ... parchment like Hyoid bone was found intact (ante mortem)
And bite mark over inner of both upper and lower limbs (Postmortem)
Other finds: Eyes -clear
Jayabalan] and another witness, viz., Natarajan, he prepared a Rough Sketch marked as Ex.P.15. He also conducted inquest on the dead body ... coffee brown underwear, dried blood stain present over nostrils, chest, ant bite marks present over body.
External Injuries:- [Ante mortem]
[1] V shaped lacerated injury
accused got provoked and strangulated her with his hands and then, bite her on her neck. The deceased died.
[c] By about 04.00 hours ... they found the dead body of the deceased. There was also bite mark on the neck. When P.W.1 shouted
State By Yelahanka New Town Police vs G.Manjunatha on 27 April, 2016
IN THE
Wound
Certificate, wherein I have noticed following injury;
" pressure abrasion (bite mark) 1 cm X 0.5 cm
present over front and back of left ... discussed in Ex.P.1, there is no any specific placement
of bite injury. Pw.1 lodged F.I.R., only after ascertaining of facts
Bangalore, accused let his dog and
wrongfully restrained him and the dog bite him causing him bleeding
injuries and when C.W.2 questioned ... prosecution examined 7 witnesses
as P.W.1 to 7 and got marked 5 documents as Ex.P.1 to P.5. The accused
