blunt substance and simple in nature and injury of other victims
are also caused by hard blunt substance and not by sharp cut
weapon
simple
in nature caused by hard and blunt substance and not by sharp
edged weapon. Appellant has no criminal antecedent.
On the other hand, learned
deceased caused by hard, hury and blunt
substance and not by the sharp edged weapon. Assailant of the
said injury is also not ascertained. Petitioners
informant inflicted by
hard and blunt substance and not by garasa i.e. sharp edged
weapon which creates doubt about the prosecution case.
Allegation
simple in
nature caused by hard and blunt substance and not by sharp
cutting weapon and only one incised wound on the person
head of the informant caused by hard
blunt substance and not by sharp edged weapon, which rules out
the aforesaid allegation levelled against the appellant
simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance and
not by sharp cutting weapon. There is case and counter case
between the parties. Allegation
said to have descended at the house of the informant
armed with weapons and assaulted the informant. They also
assaulted his son Pawan Kumar, Raju ... been opined to be caused by hard and blunt substance and not
by sharp cutting weapon, which rules out the prosecution case.
Six persons
simple in nature caused by hard and
blunt substance and not by sharp cutting weapon. Petitioner
no.2 happens to be lady. Petitioners have
simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance
and not by the sharp edged weapon which creates serious doubt
about the prosecution case. Though