abducted, he is maimed, he is done away with, or even bribed. There
is no protection for him. In adjourning the matter without any valid ... prosecution had been able to prove the demand and
acceptance of the bribe and the recovery of the tainted money from the
accused and, therefore
respondent, Reid, was a
Crown-prosecutor in Hong Kong. He
took bribes as an inducement to
suppress certain criminal
prosecutions and with those monies,
acquired ... name of his solicitor.
He was found guilty of the offence
of bribe-taking and sentenced by a
criminal court. The Administration
of Hong Kong
kept silent when P.W. 9 accused him of
having taken a bribe. P.Ws. 3 and 4 were the panch witnesses
who were present ... regarding the silence of the appellant when
accused of having taken the bribe. P.W. 3 further supported
the prosecution to the extent that
amount of Rs.75,000/- by way
of bribe for getting a certificate for non-agricultural use of his land. To
quote from the complaint ... demanded an
amount of Rs.75,000/- as a bribe."
On the basis of the above complaint, the vigilance arranged a trap. The
First
should also pay
him certain percentage of his bills as a bribe. It is
sufficient to say that both the courts have found that ... High Court has held that the appellant did make a demand
for bribe in June, 1957, when he visited Tolkeshwar and that
the complainant
prosecution
insofar as demand made by the accused for the bribe is
concerned and the prosecution did not examine any other
witness present ... accused. In the absence of any evidence to prove
the payment of bribe or to show that the accused had
voluntarily accepted the money knowing
Government
on the floor of the House on July 28, 1993 by bribing
Members of Parliament of different political parties,
individuals and groups ... revealed that the four Members of Parliament belonging to
JMM had been bribed in crores of rupees for voting agains
the `No Confidence Motion
would disallow tax payers from claiming
“protection money, extortion, hafta, bribes, etc.” as business expenditures,14 from
13
2011 (4) MPLJ 691.
14
Memorandum Explaining ... elucidated the
ambit of Explanation 1 to include “protection money, extortion, hafta, bribes,
etc.”, yet, ipso facto, by no means is the embargo envisaged restricted
protected.
HEADNOTE:
On report of S, that the appellant had offered a bribe to
'him, which S did not accept, the Police laid ... room where
they alone were present, the appellant handed over the bribe
to S. In the room a microphone of 'a tape recorder
contractor
and held that the money had been taken as a bribe, that the
defence story was improbable and untrue, that the
presumption under ... further to be
proved that the money was accepted as a bribe, (iii) and
that even if the presumption arose it was rebutted when
