Prakash Kumar vs Patna Municipal Corporation Through ... on 2 November, 2020
Prakash Kumar vs Patna Municipal Corporation Through ... on 2 November, 2020
Author: Mohit Kumar Shah
Search Results Page
Search Results
11 - 20 of 17099 (0.48 seconds)Sushil Ansal vs State Thr.Cbi on 5 March, 2014
installation of the
DVB transformer, various structural and fire safety deviations in the
building in violation of various Rules and not facilitating the escape ... number of 14 witnesses were examined
to prove the structural deviations in the building upon an inspection
conducted after the fire incident. An equally large
Wp(C ) No. 1914/202 vs Aijaz Ahmad Baba 2. Manzoor Ahmad on 29 January, 2024
interpreted the expression
„unauthorized building‟ appearing in Building byelaw 2.1.1 to mean a
building raised without grant of a building permit. According to the
Tribunal ... defines „unauthorised
building‟ as a building undertaken after a building permit has lapsed or
after a building permit has been revoked. The reasoning adopted
Wp(C ) No. 1914/202 vs Aijaz Ahmad Baba 2. Manzoor Ahmad on 29 January, 2024
interpreted the expression
„unauthorized building‟ appearing in Building byelaw 2.1.1 to mean a
building raised without grant of a building permit. According to the
Tribunal ... defines „unauthorised
building‟ as a building undertaken after a building permit has lapsed or
after a building permit has been revoked. The reasoning adopted
Wp(C ) No. 1914/202 vs Aijaz Ahmad Baba 2. Manzoor Ahmad on 29 January, 2024
interpreted the expression
„unauthorized building‟ appearing in Building byelaw 2.1.1 to mean a
building raised without grant of a building permit. According to the
Tribunal ... defines „unauthorised
building‟ as a building undertaken after a building permit has lapsed or
after a building permit has been revoked. The reasoning adopted
Sri.H.C.Amarnath vs The Commissioner on 28 January, 2020
residential building over the suit property
and he has constructed residential building in accordance
with the sanctioned plan without any deviation. But, on the
other ... deviating the sanctioned plan. When defendant
authority came to know about the deviation, has visited the
spot and found deviation in construction of residential
building
Friends Colony Development Committee vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 1 November, 2004
four storeyed building in accordance with the building plans
sanctioned by the Authority. The construction commenced and
when the building came up it was found ... Authority in support of his plea that all deviations in the
building are compoundable. The builder has also sought to
contend that there are several
Sanjay Gupta vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through Its Chief ... on 12 April, 2022
easily be ascertained whether there have
been unauthorised deviations. The building is still standing. These
are matters which can easily be verified by the Court ... Union of India & Ors. 13 noticed the deviations in the building plans of
the theater. The High Court considered a similar argument
Bakhtawar Trust & Ors vs M.D. Narayan & Ors on 6 May, 2003
from 22nd May 1972 to 12th October, 1984 has
constructed any building deviating from the said Zonal
Regulations as modified by this ... view of
Section 3(1) of the impugned Act, any building that has deviated from the
Zonal Regulations, as modified, may nonetheless be regularized
Priyanka Estate International (P.) ... vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 28 July, 2006
inspection of the multistoried building will be conducted by the authority and, therefore, asked him to submit copies of the building permission and approved drawing ... submit the said building permission and approved drawing within the stipulated time and if continued to make construction of the building deviating from the building