Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 158 (0.96 seconds)

Mariadassou Philomene vs Member Secretary on 6 July, 2015

writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to demolish the deviated building constructed by the 3rd respondent at Door No.91, Montorsier Street, Puducherry ... filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to demolish the deviated building constructed by the 3rd respondent at Door No.91, Montorsier Street, Puducherry
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D.Lakshmi vs The Commissioner on 20 August, 2018

found that the 5th Respondent had put up his building by deviating the Approved Plan. Action was initiated against the 5th Respondent and a Lock ... applicant/building owner to rectify the defect noticed in deviation and restore the building as per the approved drawing within stipulated period as directed
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Alarmel Valli vs The Secretary

three months for the purpose of rectification of the deviations and to restore the building as per the approved plan. Pursuant to the order dated ... said Committee, considering the aspect of deviations, found that there was no major deviation such as violation of Floor Space Index unlawful or unauthorised additional
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next