thus reaching the balcony floor through the stairway. Another deviation in the building argued by Mr.Tulsi was that the owners had constructed an independent ... gate per 100 patrons.
20. The other major structural deviation in the building alleged by the petitioners is the construction of the rear wall
Engineers of the Building Department, MCD on 29.4.96 who
submitted a report on 30.4.96 to the Executive Engineer (Building) mentioning about
deviations. The MCD wrote ... building by their acts and omissions of allowing installation of the DESU/DVB
transformer in the Uphaar cinema building and various deviations from structural
building plans could be
sanctioned only by the (Building) (HQ) located at Town Hall,
Delhi. The engineers (Building) (HQ) inspected the building
and sanctioned ... building
plan was sanctioned filed by the Building (HQ) located at
Town Hall, Delhi. However, the Engineers (Building) (HQ)
inspected the building and sanctioned
concerned. If the license was being renewed inspite of minor deviations in the building or in the seating arrangements in the balcony, the cinema management ... employees. It is also submitted that minor deviations or violations of the building bye-laws or Cinematograph Act and rules there under would
only denied having made any unauthorised
construction and deviations against the sanctioned
building plan it has also denied receipt of show cause
notice under Sections ... further information
under Section 344(2) and 344(4) . Deviation against
sanctioned building plans, excess coverage at
basement, GF, FF, SF & TF under construction
against the sanctioned building plans for building on plot No. 20-A, Friends Colony, New Delhi that the building plans for the aforesaid property were ... obtaining completion certificate, revised plans suggesting the changes/alterations/modifications / deviations within the Building Bye-Laws are inquired to be submitted as there would always
Bldg.) of MCD had reported that there is a deviation against the sanction
building plan at the ground floor, first floor and second floor ... revealed that the plaintiff himself has made deviation against
the sanctioned building plan at the floors occupied by him i.e. ground floor and
first
tribunal it was also noticed that on account of
deviations in the building plan, compoundable fee of Rs.10,928/- was
realized which was paid ... that the deviations in the building were
not such which could result in demolition of the building, but the
deviations were compoundable, and therefore
consonance with the bye-laws and profile of the building plan. If any deviation is made outside the plan the same is permissible under ... petitioner is, therefore, allowed to commence construction but if any deviation from the Building Byelaws takes place or revised plan is not filed within
that as it may, since there are excess non-compoundable deviations in the building in the occupation of the petitioner as well as the private ... that as it may, since there are excess non-compoundable deviations in the building in the occupation of the petitioner as well as the private
