consequently direct the Respondents
1 and 2 to demolish the deviated building constructed by the 3rd
Respondent at Door No.91, Montorsier Street, Puducherry ... passing of an order by this Court in demolishing the
deviated building constructed by the 3rd Respondent and this Court on
08.11.2013 was pleased
writ of Mandamus, directing the Second Respondent to demolish the deviated building constructed by the Third Respondent at Door No.91, Montorsier Street, Puducherry ... this Court in directing the Second Respondent to demolish the deviated building constructed by the Third Respondent at Door No.91, Montorsier Street, Puducherry
19103 of 2021 had constructed a building deviating
from the original plan, with a deviation to the extent of 18.08 sq. ft. on
the ground ... 19104 of 2021, had constructed a building
deviating from the original plan, with a deviation to the extent of 182.79
sq.ft and the petitioner
site Deviated /
Buildign area as Unauthorised area
per TNHB
Layout
1 Ground Floor 852 sq.ft. 1214 sq.ft. Rear set back deviated
building area ... site Deviated /
Buildign area as Unauthorised area
per TNHB
Layout
1 Ground Floor Nil 725 sq.ft. Unauthorised /
deviated building at
side set back
layout
1. Ground Floor 852 sqft 1214 sft Rear set back deviated
building area at 362 sft
2. Second Floor Nil 362 sft Rear ... TNHB layout
1. Ground Floor Nil 752 sft Unauthorised /
deviated building at
side set back 725 sq.ft
2. First Floor
suppressed by the third respondent/land owner.
2.3 Though certain deviations in the building construction were found out, the petitioner was advised that those deviations ... building. Thereafter, the second respondent locked and sealed the building in question on 29.05.2014. In order to protect their investment in the building, the petitioner
notice u/s 256 (1) and (2) if there is deviation from the building plan.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties ... respondents 1 to 6 have constructed their respective building (s) or portion of the building deviating from the sanctioned plan. A fact finding enquiry should
road widening portion.
The 9th respondent school has constructed the building with minor deviation
to the approved plan as follows.
Sl Description As per plan ... first respondent is that, the building under
reference is not an unauthorized commercial building and it is a school
building approved by CMDA as stated
accommodation to the petitioners and thereafter, rectifying the
deviations / demolish the unauthorised portion of the building.
7.This court has considered the submissions made ... every person in occupation of the
building or portion thereof to which the notice relates shall vacate the
building or portion as directed
completion certificate to all categories of buildings except individual building
and residential building upto 3 dwellings and the said G.O. is prospective in
nature ... Country Planning Act, 1971, seeking
permission to rectify the deviations in the building, besides making
representation to the second respondent /TNRERA, who is the competent
