Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 404 (1.25 seconds)

Sushil Ansal vs State Thr.Cbi on 5 March, 2014

installation of the DVB transformer, various structural and fire safety deviations in the building in violation of various Rules and not facilitating the escape ... number of 14 witnesses were examined to prove the structural deviations in the building upon an inspection conducted after the fire incident. An equally large
Supreme Court of India Cites 90 - Cited by 182 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Sushil Ansal vs State Thr.Cbi on 5 March, 2014

installation of the DVB transformer, various structural and fire safety deviations in the building in violation of various Rules and not facilitating the escape ... number of 14 witnesses were examined to prove the structural deviations in the building upon an inspection conducted after the fire incident. An equally large
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - T S Thakur - Full Document

K.Srinivasa Rao vs The Chairman on 17 December, 2014

constructed a building consisting of Stilt+4 floors, with eight dwelling units of residential buildings. The building has been constructed after obtaining building permission from ... petitioner had obtained building plan from the 5th respondent dated 31.12.2012. The petitioner has constructed his building with deviation and violation. Therefore, the 5th respondent
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - C S Karnan - Full Document

K.Srinivasa Rao vs The Chairman on 17 December, 2014

apply for service connection in respect of the special building/multi storied building. 9. He further submits that the Division Bench by an order dated ... petitioner had obtained building plan from the 5th respondent dated 31.12.2012. The petitioner has constructed his building with deviation and violation. Therefore, the 5th respondent
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - C S Karnan - Full Document

K.Srinivasa Rao vs The Chairman on 17 December, 2014

apply for service connection in respect of the special building/multi storied building. 9. He further submits that the Division Bench by an order dated ... petitioner had obtained building plan from the 5th respondent dated 31.12.2012. The petitioner has constructed his building with deviation and violation. Therefore, the 5th respondent
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - C S Karnan - Full Document

Shibnath Chandra & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 2 September, 2014

District  -  Hooghly  at  the  instance  of  the  respondent no. 7 deviating from the building sanctioned plan.  2 It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing ... respondent no. 7, on instruction,  that if there is any  deviation from  the building sanctioned plant, he has no objection for demolition of  that  portion
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - D K Gupta - Full Document

196/2014 on 10 April, 2014

construction was raised by the said appellant strictly according to the building plan sanctioned by the municipal authorities which is however, disputed by the private ... municipal authorities submits that both the parties have constructed their own building in deviation to the sanctioned building plan although such deviations are minor
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - P K Chattopadhyay - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next