second proviso' to Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965?
Have the courts below erred in granting protection ... indicating that he needed the premises for personal occupation. There were 15 buildings in the locality. The details of the buildings were given. These were
right in law allowing the expenses incurred for the maintenance of the buildings ? "
2. In I.T.R. No. 76 of 1978, the question ... allowing the expenses incurred for the maintenance of the buildings ? "
5. Since the correctness of the decision of this court in CIT v. Travancore
assessee from 1920 onwards. The assessee had claimed depreciation for the factory buildings and this had been allowed in the previous years. During the accounting ... capital gains on the land and the capital gains on the factory buildings separately. The question of capital gains on the land is not relevant
principles contained in the Limitation Act to the proceedings under the Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
3. The Limitation Act contains the general ... court under the Code of Civil Procedure . Section 23 of the Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, is an instance of this type
raised under the second proviso to Section 11(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred ... herein P.M. Parthakumar. That business was run in a premises (including buildings which are the petition schedule buildings in these cases) which was purchased
lets on hire machinery, plant or furniture belonging to him and also buildings, and the letting of the buildings is inseparable from letting ... according to that provision, most of the deductions allowed in respect of buildings, plant, machinery any furniture used for the purposes of business are allowed
town planning" and
"Regulation of land use and construction of buildings". Article 243-ZD
provides for constitution of Committee for district planning ... after the coming
into force of this Act, transfer all institutions, schemes, buildings,
other properties, assets and liabilities connected with the matters
mentioned
WORKS DEPARTMENT,
REP. BY THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,
KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT,
JAGAD BUILDINGS, KOWDIAR P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003.
3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
PWD ROADS ... WORKS DEPARTMENT, REP. BY THE
PROJECT DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE TRANSPORT
PROJECT, JAGAD BUILDINGS, KOWDIAR P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003.
3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS
Cochin Town Planning Trust on 6.3.1975 permitting
construction of residential buildings in the property. Apparently, the Greater
Cochin Development Authority, created by the State Government ... According to the petitioner, the entire area is covered with buildings,
however, when the petitioner submitted an application seeking building permit,
objection was raised
line building in Alappuzha Town. The landlord sought eviction of the buildings on the ground of arrears of rent as against the respondents ... need for the petitioner. He has another residence in Alappuzha and other buildings in other places. He is not residing with his brother Chandresh
