evidence also that the informant, namely, Pachay
Munduiya (P.W.1) is an eye witness of the case and he had also
sustained bullet injury ... Size 4 cm. inverted margin with profuse
blooding. Bullet trapped in exit wound. Bullet seized and handed
over to investigating Police Officer.
(c) Firearm fracturing
evidence also that the informant, namely, Pachay
Munduiya (P.W.1) is an eye witness of the case and he had also
sustained bullet injury ... Size 4 cm. inverted margin with profuse
blooding. Bullet trapped in exit wound. Bullet seized and handed
over to investigating Police Officer.
(c) Firearm fracturing
evidence also that the informant, namely, Pachay
Munduiya (P.W.1) is an eye witness of the case and he had also
sustained bullet injury ... Size 4 cm. inverted margin with profuse
blooding. Bullet trapped in exit wound. Bullet seized and handed
over to investigating Police Officer.
(c) Firearm fracturing
evidence also that the informant, namely, Pachay
Munduiya (P.W.1) is an eye witness of the case and he had also
sustained bullet injury ... Size 4 cm. inverted margin with profuse
blooding. Bullet trapped in exit wound. Bullet seized and handed
over to investigating Police Officer.
(c) Firearm fracturing
evidence also that the informant, namely, Pachay
Munduiya (P.W.1) is an eye witness of the case and he had also
sustained bullet injury ... Size 4 cm. inverted margin with profuse
blooding. Bullet trapped in exit wound. Bullet seized and handed
over to investigating Police Officer.
(c) Firearm fracturing
JHHC:9716-DB
shattered by bullets fired by the abovementioned
gangsters, and other incriminating evidence were seized
by police from the site of the afore ... Ritwik Company along with this
petitioner/appellant and others.
67. It is evident from the case diary at para 100 wherein
confessional statement of Chandan
appellants, at the
place of occurrence giving bullet shot, has been corroborated
by him in the evidence recorded in course of the trial.
10. Learned ... connectivity of firing of bullet from the same pistol, but
that is lacking herein.
51. It is further evident, on the basis of the testimony
marked as X for identification.
12. The trial Court, after evaluating the evidence of
prosecution witnesses found the charges levelled against the
appellant proved ... deposed that the convict, namely, Chhotu Singh,
has assaulted the deceased through bullet from
behind the head while in the cross-examination it
has come
marked as X for identification.
12. The trial Court, after evaluating the evidence of
prosecution witnesses found the charges levelled against the
appellant proved ... deposed that the convict, namely, Chhotu Singh,
has assaulted the deceased through bullet from
behind the head while in the cross-examination it
has come
evidence that
the incident is of 26.06.1994. He was plaguing his farm
in Fulkati Mauza. Then he heard sound of bullet firing
coming from east ... evidence that
on the time of occurrence, he was ploughing the farm of
his cousin sister. He heard sound of bullet as also halla
