Central Administrative Tribunal, (hereinafter called CAT) Cuttack Bench. The CAT, Cuttack Bench by its judgment and order dated 07.11.88 dismissed such petition and allowed ... contrary to the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 30.11.95. By the impugned order dated 25.11.99 the CAT, Calcutta Bench gave
against the order of punishment was dismissed by appellant No. 2 vide order dated 14/19.6.2000.
5. Respondent challenged orders dated ... response, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the order of CAT as affirmed by the High Court does not suffer from any legal infirmity
considered for appointment. Appellant questioned legality of the
CAT's order before the Patna High Court. By the impugned order, the
High Court dismissed ... forward
to deny the statement and the allegation and therefore order of the CAT
did not warrant interference.
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that
duty. Finally, order of removal from service was passed by the disciplinary authority vide order dated 27.7.1993. Appeal against the order was filed, rejected ... vide order dated 28.12.1994. The revisional authority confirmed the order of appellate authority. Therefore, petitioner filed Original Application No.608 of 1998 before CAT.
Respondents
Rules, Regulations and provisions of Indian Railway Establishment Manual (IREM), therefore, order of CAT dated ... services though granted temporary status from 01-01-1985. CAT passed the order ignoring binding precedents, IREM and Railway Board order dated
June, 2005
Equivalent citations: 2005(3)SLJ210(CAT)
ORDER
Shankar Prasad, Member (A)
1. Aggrieved by the order of Disciplinary Authority imposing the penalty ... appeal, the Tribunal will have to entertain the application against the order."
13. The following principles emerge from the aforesaid decisions:
(i) That
February, 2005
Equivalent citations: 2006(1)SLJ86(CAT)
ORDER
Shanker Raju, Member (J)
1. Applicant impugns respondents' order dated 28.8.2002, imposing upon
September, 2005
Equivalent citations: 2007(1)SLJ217(CAT)
ORDER
M.P. Singh, Vice Chairman
1. As the issue involved in both the aforementioned Original Applications
October, 2005
Equivalent citations: 2006(3)SLJ59(CAT)
ORDER
K.B.S. Rajan, Member (J)
1. The explosive expansion of the Railways to cater ... letter of even number dated 6.12.96 in the context of CAT/Mumbai Bench judgment in O.A. No. 941/1997 titled Shri Ravi Bhargava
August, 2005
Equivalent citations: 2006(1)SLJ209(CAT)
ORDER
J.K. Kaushik, Member (J)
1. Shri Anil Kumar Jain has assailed the order dated
