year from the date of such
instrument?
F. Whether the CCRA has erred in rejecting the
Applicant's submission that there was no delay ... time stipulated in the order of NCLT
Ahmedabad itself?
H. Whether the CCRA ought not to have set aside the
order of the Collector imposing
challenged order dated 12th July,
2024 passed by Chief Controlling Revenue
Authority (CCRA) as well as order dated 03 rd
October, 2012 passed by Deputy ... Collector
(Stamps), by which CCRA has dismissed the appeal
of the petitioner against the order passed by the
Deputy Collector (Stamps) on the ground
document. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred
Revision Application no.37/2004 before the CCRA under Section 44(2)
of the Act for refund of the stamp ... duty paid in excess whereupon the
CCRA issued two notices dated 22-12-2006 and 2-3-2007 under Section
2016 CAV ORDER DATED: 21/03/2022
Act, the Ld. CCRA is bound by his own findings
and is required to make corrections ... Whether in proceedings under section 53 of the
Act, the Ld. CCRA is under an obligation to
consider and refer to the documents on record
appeal was
filed under Section 53(1) and in the decision of CCRA, it
is held that as per sale deed bearing N.2401/2007 ... 12958/2016 JUDGMENT
decision of the CCRA was therefore legal and not required
to be interfered with.
5. Having considered the rival submissions of
learned
deficit stamp duty for preferring an Appeal before CCRA.
It appears that as the period of 90 days as contemplated
under Section ... Stamp Act had expired,
the said Challan was not accepted by the CCRA and the
application dated 28.01.2015 came to be rejected and
communicated
appellate order is kept blank.
(Mr. Bhagat has pointed out that CCRA's order's date
in this case ... date of order of Dy. Collector is 2-5-1996.
that of CCRA's order is12-6-1998).
12.
8289/99
Fulchand Dhanraj Shah
Ambuja Cements Limited vs Chief Controlling Revenue Authority on 10 February, 2023
Author: Aravind Kumar
15899/2019 JUDGMENT
Deputy Collector, was confirmed by the CCRA. Nishantbhai filed
Special Civil Application No. 2939 of 2011 before this Court
challenging both ... petition and quashed the orders passed by the
Deputy Collector and CCRA. On 01.06.2013, after remand, the
order was passed to pay the deficit stamp
15899/2019 JUDGMENT
Deputy Collector, was confirmed by the CCRA. Nishantbhai filed
Special Civil Application No. 2939 of 2011 before this Court
challenging both ... petition and quashed the orders passed by the
Deputy Collector and CCRA. On 01.06.2013, after remand, the
order was passed to pay the deficit stamp
