passed by the Respondent No.2-Chief
Controlling Revenue Authority (CCRA) rejecting/dismissing Petitioner's
application and appeal for refund of stamp duty under ... refund of stamp duty?"
8. The Respondent No.2-CCRA rejected the application of Petitioner for
refund of stamp duty on 12th December
petition has been filed against the order dated 19.2.2013 passed by the CCRA in Stamp Appeal No. 39/2012-13 ( Smt. Vandana Agrawal Vs. State ... Thereby, the CCRA has confirmed the order dated 12.9.2012 passed by the Stamp Collector in Stamp Case No. 52/2011-12 determining stamp deficiency
2016 CAV ORDER DATED: 21/03/2022
Act, the Ld. CCRA is bound by his own findings
and is required to make corrections ... Whether in proceedings under section 53 of the
Act, the Ld. CCRA is under an obligation to
consider and refer to the documents on record
women and children viz., Centre for Constitutional Rights
Research & Advocacy (CCRA).
7. The paramount contention advanced is that the 3 rd respondent
Association
women and children viz., Centre for Constitutional Rights
Research & Advocacy (CCRA).
7. The paramount contention advanced is that the 3 rd respondent
Association
VIDHANA VEEDI,
BANGALORE 560 001
4
2. THE CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY
(CCRA & INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
AND COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS
ELAMAKKARA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
CELINE
AGED 59 YEARS
PAVOTHITHARA HOUSE,
CCRA 1141467
CHANGAMPUZHA ROAD, EDAPALLY,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682024
BY ADVS.
K.R.VINOD
ordinates without any application of mind.
10.This Court in Thirumaran Vs. CCRA passed in
W.P.No.11413 of 1989 held that if there
same was rejected.
Therefore, the application of the applicant filed before
the CCRA for setting aside the order of COS and for
refund of excess
Stamp Act, 1899 and the appeal order dated 06.6.2012 passed by the CCRA rejecting the Stamp Appeal No. 16 filed by the petitioner against
