Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

support his case. The Tribunal in Power Mak Industries -2018-TIOL-1352- CESAT-HYD, in which one of the Members here was also a party

case of CCE Raigad Vs Savita Polymers Ltd 2006 TIOL-1463-CESAT-MUM. As such, inasmuch as the credit stands reversed within a fortnight from

Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise LTU, Mumbai 2014-TIOL-115-CESAT-MUM (vii) Commissioner of C. Ex., Indore Vs. Gwalior Chemicals Industries

Whether the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) as- well-as Learned CESAT, New Delhi were justified in non- considering the letters addressed to dealers/distributors which were

services. The classification of services 2 2023 (7) TMI 57 - (CESAT Chandigarh.) 4 Service Tax Appeal No. 50209 of 2017 provided under any other category

from each unit. (Emphasis supplied) 7.4.3 It is to be noted that CESAT Delhis above decision in the case of British Scaffolding India

CESTAT Bang.] e) Shanoob MS Vs CC [2017 (1) TMI 749 - CESAT Bang.] f) Sant Lal Gupta Vs Modern Cooperative Group Housing Society

Midex Global Pvt Ltd vs. CC, Pune [2018 (10) TMI 770- Cesat Mumbai] (h) Posco Maharashtra Steel Ltd vs. CC (Export

following cases: • Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad vs. CST: 2019-TIOL-1879-CESAT-AHM. • Indian Institute of Aircraft Engineering

Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax: 2022-TIOL-355-CESAT-DEL. 4.3 Rebutting the argument of the learned advocate that the demand is barred