Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.79 seconds)

State vs . Parveen on 4 August, 2012

However, he admitted that he had neither got the said mobile sent to any CFSL Lab nor he had himself checked to find out whether ... Besides this, the mobile phone of the accused which was seized by the I.O, had never been sent for CFSL examination
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Title : State (Cbi) vs . on 30 April, 2012

call was received from mobile number 98990332364 at 6.36.27 pm Thereafter, next call was received at 6.56.29 pm from mobile number 9810482520 at point ... received at 5.18.50 pm from mobile number 9899032364. Thereafter, next call was received on 30.04.2007 at 5.32.40 pm from mobile number 9873507778, these were marked
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

4 vs . on 24 July, 2012

Thereafter they started making telephone calls on his mobile phone No. 9891102594. The bell of the mobile phone was ringing ... asked their nephew Hemant to call on the mobile phone of her son. Hemant telephoned on mobile phone of her son. Some one had attended
Delhi District Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next