which are yet to come. Some items (mobile
phone, retrieved e-mails etc.) have been forwarded to CFSL for
forensic analysis and their examination reports ... analyzed. Some items such as mobile phones and retrieved e-mails were
sent to the CFSL for forensic analysis. The application brings out that
taken and sent to CFSL to match the voices in the tape-recorded
conversation. The call details of the mobile phone of Dilshad ... phones on which recording were done were
neither seized nor sent to CFSL for analysis. Though it is alleged that the
recovery of the child
near a
restaurant in Safdarjung Enclave wherefrom Rahul got recovered a broken
mobile phone having IEMI Nos.910040992852058 and 910040992852066
which was seized as recorded ... April 20, 2012 another CFSL team headed by Subrat Kumar
Chaudhary, Senior Scientific Officer-II (Physics), Physics Division, CFSL
examined the red coloured Indica car bearing
disclosure statement Ex.PW-34/N and pursuant
thereto got recovered a mobile phone having IEMI No.354314003411185
from his house.
14. Few days later ... specimen finger prints of appellant Niranjan Kumar and Anand Kishore.
Vide CFSL report dated January 20, 2006 it was opined that one chance
print found
soil lifted from the spot had also not been sent for any
CFSL examination; whether the said sample, soil contained
blood, human ... 2008 Page 11 of 14
19. The recovery of the mobile phone from Rajender on
12.3.2004 has been documented in Ex.PW-6/A. Const
State vs Mohd. Afzal And Ors. [Along With Crl. A. ... on 29 October, 2003
Equivalent
Rakesh Kumar & Ors. vs State on 27 August, 2009
Author: Pradeep Nandrajog
Bench: Pradeep
Sanjay Mishra vs State on 22 May, 2012
Author: Pradeep Nandrajog
Bench: Pradeep Nandrajog , Pratibha
Vinod Kumar vs State on 16 March, 2009
Author: Pradeep Nandrajog
Bench: Pradeep Nandrajog , Aruna
Vinod vs State on 8 February, 2016
Author: Mukta Gupta
Bench: Pradeep Nandrajog , Mukta Gupta
